Back Talk | Letters to the Editor | Indy Week
Pin It

Back Talk 

Letters to the Editor

Keep the heat on
I see that the Indy has published another article on the Rules Review Commission ("Special interests still rule on RRC," Aug. 24). I look forward to reading it. I was outraged at what I read in your first article ("Growth Rules," July 6) and wrote a letter to both my state representative and senator. The letters of course did not do much, but if enough pressure is kept up over a long enough time, citizens may be thrown a crumb of representation on this board. One interesting item I found was when you go on the N.C. Web site and look for boards and commissions, there is only an Adobe link to a list of them. There is not any information on members, meetings, agendas, compensation. Please keep this issue going.
Peter Childers
Raleigh

Wrong school for Dix
I was surprised to learn that all of the alternative plans for the Dix property include a school campus ("Planners muscle up," Aug. 24). There had been no public clamor for a school on the site, nor would it bring in money for the state. How then did it get in both plans? It further appears that this campus is already slated to be given to Raleigh Charter High School, which wants to expand from its current leased space.

But why should North Carolina taxpayers' money or land be given to Raleigh Charter High School? It calls itself a public school but is actually a taxpayer-financed elite segregation academy: 93 percent of its students are white, and none are eligible for free or reduced lunch, according to www.publicschoolreview.com, a Web site that profiles schools nationwide. This school of privilege siphons off students, teachers and resources from the real public schools, which have a mandate to serve everybody.

Evidently some influential parents have inserted this giveaway into the Dix plans, to move Raleigh Charter to the most coveted real estate in town. For shame!
Matthew Brown
Raleigh

Independent investigation
The federal response to Hurricane Katrina is a national scandal ("The disaster that shouldn't have been," Sept. 7). Our nation was better prepared and responded better after 9/11.

Four years after 9/11, it is clear the Bush administration has made us less safe.

We need an independent commission modeled on the 9/11 Commission to investigate what went wrong at FEMA and other agencies. Congress should support Senator Clinton's legislation calling for an independent commission modeled after the 9/11 Commission.

We can't let one political party--especially the one running the government--control the investigation of the federal response to Hurricane Katrina.

The investigation must be independent from the politicians and have its own investigators, budget and subpoena authority.
Dean Hoskins
Durham

  • Letters to the Editor

Latest in Letters to the Editor

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor



Twitter Activity

Comments

If the headline had been: "Is Scott Crawford Better Off Without Standard Food"? The answer would have been a resounding …

by Sue Mixson on Plate Expectations (Letters to the Editor)

Emma Laperruque and your response to this situation have been very unprofessional. Seeing the way both your organization and she …

by TayWoo on Plate Expectations (Letters to the Editor)

Most Read

  1. Sausage and Legislation (Peripheral Visions)
  2. Mind On Our Money (Letters to the Editor)
  3. Blast from the Past. (Peripheral Visions)

Most Recent Comments

If the headline had been: "Is Scott Crawford Better Off Without Standard Food"? The answer would have been a resounding …

by Sue Mixson on Plate Expectations (Letters to the Editor)

Emma Laperruque and your response to this situation have been very unprofessional. Seeing the way both your organization and she …

by TayWoo on Plate Expectations (Letters to the Editor)

Please, Mr. Keen, inform us on what kind of person Hilary Clinton is. But please leave out the innuendo, unsupported …

by GorSun on Smug Revisionism (Letters to the Editor)

Thank you cleverweist1 and Cristel Gutshchenritter Orrand for the opportunity to stand up for what I believe in as a …

by half full on A Massive Scar (Letters to the Editor)

Mr Pollock makes some good points .
Noam Chomsky and Ron Paul have similar views on wars we have waged …

by CHHS Tiger on History you won't like either (Letters to the Editor)

© 2017 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation