Back Talk | Letters to the Editor | Indy Week
Pin It

Back Talk 

Letters to the Editor

Free to be healthy
Ms. Dittmers' recent response to Barbara Solow's article reveals considerable confusion about health practitioner licensing [Back Talk, April 23]. Occupational licensing is justified where an occupation poses a known risk to the public, as does the practice of medicine. State licensing is unnecessary in most alternative health care practices because they do not pose a demonstrable risk. A Minnesota Health Department study found no evidence of risk; other studies have shown alternative treatments to be safer than their allopathic counterparts. A government commission found that alternative treatments improve the health of the public. Therefore, imposing restrictions is unnecessary, and only serves to limit access to health care options while depriving some professionals of their ability to practice their trade.

Medical boards charge alternative practitioners not for violating standards of practice, but for "practicing medicine without a license." This is not a safety issue--it is a turf issue. By law, members of the Medical Society, a trade group, dominate the N.C. Medical Board, creating an institutionalized monopoly that gives one profession oversight over competing trades via an administrative board. This arrangement poses an inherent conflict of interest that raises serious ethical questions.

Current medical practice laws restrict the free exercise of alternative health care occupations that may share treatment of the sick with the practice of medicine, but lack many of its risks. The state should exempt safe alternative health care practices from the medical practice law to ensure freedom of trade and consumer access to these beneficial services. House Bill 923, sponsored by Paul Luebke, deserves the support of all North Carolinians who value the right to choose from among the complete range of viable health care options to best achieve and maintain their highest levels of health.
Alan Phillips
Director, Citizens for Health Care Freedom

talk back
Got something to say about an Independent article? Send no more than 300 words to backtalk@indyweek.com; to P.O. Box 2690, Durham 27715; or fax 286-4274. Include your name, phone number and mailing address for verification; we cannot publish a letter without confirmation from the writer. We reserve the right to edit letters for length, style and clarity.

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor



Twitter Activity

Comments

"While citing the fact that he's a professor and other so-called credentials"

The original article never mentioned his academic …

by Jonathan Gilman on One More Round of Jordan Peterson Comments, Plus Some People Defend Chris Brown (Letters to the Editor)

The articles about Peterson have been extremely intellectually dishonest and factually inaccurate. Filled with unsubstantiated claims of racism, mysoginy, transphobia …

by Timothy Oswald on One More Round of Jordan Peterson Comments, Plus Some People Defend Chris Brown (Letters to the Editor)

Most Read

Most Recent Comments

"While citing the fact that he's a professor and other so-called credentials"

The original article never mentioned his academic …

by Jonathan Gilman on One More Round of Jordan Peterson Comments, Plus Some People Defend Chris Brown (Letters to the Editor)

The articles about Peterson have been extremely intellectually dishonest and factually inaccurate. Filled with unsubstantiated claims of racism, mysoginy, transphobia …

by Timothy Oswald on One More Round of Jordan Peterson Comments, Plus Some People Defend Chris Brown (Letters to the Editor)

So rather than admit your Journalist was factually wrong - a claim the National Coalition Against Censorship (NCAC) also point …

by Niall O' Sullivan on One More Round of Jordan Peterson Comments, Plus Some People Defend Chris Brown (Letters to the Editor)

Outright referring to Peterson's defenders with epithets (one of them rather sexist) is a great way to bolster his message …

by linville_2112 on Jordan Peterson’s Bro Minions Would Like a Word With Us (Letters to the Editor)

Ellen and Jessica are spot on, and the problem is the industry does a great job of hiding all of …

by Denette on What About the Pigs? (Letters to the Editor)

© 2018 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation