Triangulator

The news blog of the Independent Weekly

Archives | RSS

Sunday, February 5, 2012

In "Carrboro Commune" CVS takeover, no arrests, no SWAT team, plenty of controversy

Posted by Joe Schwartz on Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 1:39 AM

A group of 20 anti-capitalist protesters occupied CVS-owned in property in downtown Carrboro for three hours Saturday night before walking out at the strong encouragement of town police and Carrboro Mayor Mark Chilton, who each told them they would be charged with breaking and entering if they did not leave.

The demonstration concerned a forthcoming rezoning application from CVS to build a two-story, 24,000 square foot building at 201 N. Greensboro St., to house a 24-hour drug store and office space.

The anarchist demonstrators, who call themselves "Carrboro Commune" and align with "Occupy Everything," would rather the site be used for a community center, free school, health clinic or performance space.

Maria Rowan stood outside the building handing out fliers inviting passersby to an open assembly at 4 p.m. Sunday to discuss what to do with the building.

"It's my personal hope that the community reclaims our vision for this land and make it clear that multinational corporations and their money are not more important than people," she said

Upon exiting at 7:10 p.m. wearing black bandanas for masks and carrying black flags, Carrboro Commune members promised more occupations and engaged in a heated discussion with Chilton.

They derided the mayor for enforcing property law. Some hurled expletives at him. They said police are one command away from being Nazis.

"I don't think treating your fellow human beings that way is going to get us anywhere," Chilton fired back.

"Look under here, it's skin" he said, pointing to his shirt.

THE VIEW FROM OUTSIDE

(For Carrboro Commune's perspective from the inside, check tweets from @carrborocommune or visit www.trianarchy.wordpress.com. I was told by Carrboro Police Chief Carolyn Hutchinson that reporting from inside would be a crime in her eyes. Other media outlets did enter.)

News that the building was occupied reached me at 5 p.m. via a press release. The occupation had been going on for an hour by that point.

When I arrived Chilton was already inside asking the group to exit. Aldermen Dan Coleman, Jacquelyn Gist, Sammy Slade were across the street as were Chief Hutchinson and Interim Town Manager Matt Efird. Hutchinson and Efird weren't commenting at that point.

Gist said that the demonstrators were asked what it would take for them to leave and said vegan ice cream.

"Our first tactic is ice cream," she said.

But the ice cream sandwiches she purchased failed to win the day.

Coleman had been inside with Chilton and said he expected a peaceful outcome.

At 6:05 p.m. a generator, later wheeled away by police, was set up and the lights turned on briefly.

Slade said the incident should open up a discussion on town policies for political protests to "make sure it would be appropriate for a town like Carrboro to do."

"It's a challenging situation in that there's a state law that protects private property," he said. "The best we can do as town government is making sure the type of force that is used is appropriate to the situation."

They did.

At 7:03 p.m. officers walked quietly inside and gave the protestors a chance to leave without incident. Minutes later demonstrators walked out carrying tables, food and other supplies. Chilton was the last to exit.

After 10 minutes of Carrboro Commune and Chilton debating outside, there was an attempt to hold a general assembly on what to do with the building. Some people agreed, but only if the elected officials would leave. Chilton walked away. The group agreed to have the advertised community conversation on 201 N. Greensboro on Sunday at 4 p.m.

On Friday, Nomadic Occupy, a group formed once Occupy Chapel Hill/Carrboro removed tents from the Peace and Justice Plaza on Franklin Street, set up camp on strip of public land across the street from the Carrboro Century Center and the CVS site.

Chilton and Efird said campers were welcome to stay there, and the demonstrators and their supporters returned to that space.

DIFFERENT THAN YATES

Unlike the Nov. 13 police raid in Chapel Hill when the same anti-capitalist occupiers broke into and stayed overnight at a former auto dealership that's laid dormant for decade, elected officials were on site and a Special Emergency Response Team was not deployed. No arrests were made.

Carrboro had the benefit of witnessing Chapel Hill's response that day and hearing the community reaction that followed.

Efird said after Saturday's incident that the town had been vigilant in the wake of the Yates controversy in anticipation of another takeover of private property.

He said he wanted to ensure that officers stuck to policy and gave proper warning before acting.

"We stuck to the core values of this community, which is what our officers do," he said.

Asked what police would have done if the protesters did not leave, Efird said, "We didn't plan that far ahead, this was a spontaneous event from that standpoint. We wanted it to be peaceful."

Chilton went inside because those who were at Yates said that if anyone had asked them to leave, they would have.

Afterward though, when he asked the group if Carrboro handled the CVS situation better than the Yates ordeal, Carrboro Commune members said no, that in both a potential community center was quashed.

THE CVS IN QUESTION

CVS, based in Rhode Island, purchased the property in 2010. A permit for rezoning was sent forward in April.

Damon Seils, a member of the Carrboro Planning Board, says he expects the board will review the CVS application next month.

Anti-CVS signs have sprouted in nearby yards ever since the company announced its plans.

Much of the neighborhood opposition to the CVS site can be found at centerofcarrboro.blogspot.com.

Depending on the final plan, two houses would be torn down to make way for a parking lot, and a dentist's office also could be affected. Mature trees are at risk. Neighbors also don't want to contend with additional traffic or round-the-clock lighting.

Some neighbors who witnessed the takeover Saturday, though, said the town process should be trusted.

Jeff Herrick, a neighbor to the CVS site who opposes the redevelopment, says efforts should be focused on making a case at public hearings.

He says this is the first interest on CVS he has heard from the protestors and he questioned how informed they are on the issue

"They didn't come and talk to us," he said.

Alderman Coleman said the group had planned to march on the CVS issue in prior months.

Rowan said that the permit process is flawed and only allows the Board of Aldermen to analyze and vote on a proposal from CVS executives rather than creating a community vision for the space.

IMPACT QUESTIONED

It's early yet, but critics of the CVS occupation were easy to find Saturday.

Gist said that she supports the Occupy movement and that she was discouraged that events such as the CVS takeover distract from the message.

"Karl Rove couldn't have designed a better tactic to discredit Occupy than the anarchists have," Gist said.

"These people aren't any different than the Tea Party," she said of the tactics, adding that, "The end result is next week CVS is going to come up and put an ugly fence in front of the property."

People of Faith Against the Death Penalty Executive Director Stephen Dear, a Carrboro resident, also questioned the strategy.

"It's very disturbing to hear you dehumanize the police, and I say that as someone who has done civil disobedience dozens of times," he said, breaking into the back and forth between Carrboro Commune and Chilton. "The more we dehumanize each other, the worse it is."

Last year, Dear violated Carrboro's anti-loitering ordinance at the corner of Jones Ferry and Davie roads that restricted people from standing, sitting or remaining there from 11 a.m. to 5 a.m. by eating his lunch there each day. The ordinance was rescinded in November. Dear also was arrested in September while protesting the execution of Troy Davis.

Those involved are undeterred. They celebrated their statement, and they sure called more attention and TV cameras to the CVS site than the neighbors have managed thus far.

More to come, no doubt.

To view Saturday's events, Check out this video from Occupy Chapel Hill: Usteam video here: http://www.ustream.tv/channel/occupych

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Comments (8)

Showing 1-8 of 8

Add a comment

For their next takeover target, I suggest the anarchists check out these sites:

http://www.ci.chapel-hill.nc.us/index.aspx…

They apparently have no idea these facilities exist.

report 2 likes, 0 dislikes   
Posted by Michael Czeiszperger on 02/07/2012 at 10:57 AM

@as400_guru--and yet being compared to the Tea Party is still the bigger insult.

@sensiblemoderate and runawayslave--it's Carrboro. Chilton represents his town well and was exactly on point.

report 1 like, 0 dislikes   
Posted by Mae on 02/07/2012 at 8:49 AM

Ms. Gist, you stated: ""These people aren't any different than the Tea Party," she said of the tactics, adding that, "The end result is next week CVS is going to come up and put an ugly fence in front of the property."

Please see below. It appears there is a $30,000,000 and 4,000+ arrest difference, among other things

The occutards committed the following, while the tea party did not.

Public masturbation
Rape
Public defication
Molotov Cocktails Thrown
Drug Arrests
Public Urination
American flags burned
Murder
Suicide


Reported Occupy Party Tea Party
Cost to Taxpayers $19,327,487 $0
(as of 11/9)
Damage to Property $10,000,000 $0
Arrests 4,149+ 0
Rapes Yes No
Public Defecation Yes No
Antisemitic Rants Yes No
Public Masturbation Yes No
Molotov Cocktails Thrown Yes No
Fights Started Yes No
Children Exploited Yes No
Police Cars Damaged Yes No
Public Intoxication Yes No
Drug Possession Arrest Yes No
Concealed Weapon Arrest Yes No
Drug Overdose Yes No
Thefts Yes No
Burglaries Yes No
Vandalism Arrest Yes No
Trespassing Arrest Yes No
Non-Fatal Shootings Yes No
Public Urination Yes No
Urination on Others Yes No
Israeli Flags Burned Yes No
American Flags Burned Yes No
American Flag Desecration Yes No
Felony Assault on an EMT Yes No
Head/Body Lice Outbreaks Yes No
Tuberculosis Outbreaks Yes No
Scabies Outbreaks Yes No
Murder Yes No
Suicide Yes No
Shots Fired at White House Yes No
Obama Endorsed It Yes No
Pelosi Endorsed It Yes No
Biden Endorsed It Yes No
Hugo Chavez Endorsed It Yes No
Farrakhan Endorsed It Yes No
CAIR Endorsed It Yes No
Socialist Party Endorsed It Yes No
NAZI Party Endorsed It Yes No
Muslim Brotherhood Endorsed It Yes No
Communist Party Endorsed It Yes No
Black Panthers Endorsed It Yes No
Marxist Union Endorsed It Yes No
9/11 Truthers Endorsed It Yes No
Nation of Islam Endorsed It Yes No

report 1 like, 4 dislikes   
Posted by as400_guru on 02/06/2012 at 5:00 PM

indy did nothing to share the views of those who occupied the building. terrible article. not one person interviewed was under the age of 40 either.

report 1 like, 6 dislikes   
Posted by danmac on 02/06/2012 at 2:29 PM

It seems to me that the town of Carrboro has set a precedent that if you break and enter into private property, as long as you claim your with any "Occupy" group, you won't be prosecuted, only asked to leave. I'm interested to see the repercussions of not arresting anyone for breaking the law.

report 4 likes, 3 dislikes   
Posted by sensible moderate on 02/06/2012 at 12:44 PM

I'm starting to get seriously annoyed at anarchists who have so little common sense. I have always believed that the revolution should be beautiful and fun, & I respect that these independent actions are striving for that; but they're failing miserably. In fact they're setting themselves up for failure--and making their own ideals harder to achieve. Demanding instant, complete and permanent victory and dehumanizing your opponents doesn't just prevent you from being co-opted by community institutions; it prevents YOU from co-opting THEM, and it poisons the discourse.

The Carrboro Commune could have claimed a real victory by setting an intention to demonstrate your ideals for a limited time, say a few hours, and inspiring the neighbors to want you to come back & even to join you. Instead you invite your opponents to call you childish & arrogant, & leave your potential allies little reason to believe they're not right.

report 3 likes, 0 dislikes   
Posted by ever&anon on 02/06/2012 at 12:32 PM

I would like to point out that Occupy Chapel Hill Carrboro had previously contacted the CVS corporate representatives, following the December 7, 2011 architectural plans presentation at Carrboro Town Hall, with a request to utilize this vacant building during the on-going zoning and use permit process. This request was turned down by CVS corporate.

report 2 likes, 1 dislike   
Posted by Amanda Ashley on 02/06/2012 at 10:23 AM

Chiltons use of Kid Gloves will result in more Vandals.
#chiltonnuttybuddy

report 2 likes, 2 dislikes   
Posted by runawayslave on 02/06/2012 at 8:07 AM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-8 of 8

Add a comment

Latest in Triangulator

More by Author

Facebook Activity

Twitter Activity

Read indyweek's Tweets

Comments

Very good analysis. One thing that is very clear is that Beverly Perdue is shopping for a job.

by Dr Apothic on Does Shell Oil have Perdue's ear on fracking? (Triangulator)

Super PACs in Durham? WTF?

This is why I'm voting for John Owens; he's pledged to not be involved …

by Max Rocket on Southern Durham Development gives $50K to developer's Super PAC (Triangulator)

© 2012 Independent Weekly • 302 E. Pettigrew St., Suite 300, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919 286 1972 • fax 919 286 4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation