Triangulator

The news blog of the Independent Weekly

Archives | RSS

Tuesday, March 1, 2011

Durham: We're not fat, we're Rubenesque

Posted by Lisa Sorg on Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9:53 AM

Peter Paul Rubens The Three Graces
  • Peter Paul Rubens' The Three Graces
Durham, you might want to pass on that third donut.

The Bull City ranked No. 11 on the Men’s Health list of the 100 fattest cities in the U.S.

And Raleigh, before you start gloating about your rotund neighbors to the west (besides, our insulation allows us to survive much longer in cold water), uncinch your belt a notch because you ranked No. 47.

The magazine arrived at its rankings using several criteria:

  • the percentage of people who are overweight
  • the percentage who have Type 2 diabetes
  • the percentage who haven’t left the couch in a month (we’re assuming MH doesn’t mean that literally)
  • the amount of money spent on junk food
  • and the number of people who ate fast food nine or more times in a month.

Greensboro received a No. 70 ranking, while Charlotte was 74th.

Corpus Christi, Texas, came in at No. 1, while San Francisco, unsurprisingly, was last.

Tags: ,

Comments (0)

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Latest in Triangulator

More by Author

Facebook Activity

Twitter Activity

Read indyweek's Tweets

Comments

Very good analysis. One thing that is very clear is that Beverly Perdue is shopping for a job.

by Dr Apothic on Does Shell Oil have Perdue's ear on fracking? (Triangulator)

Super PACs in Durham? WTF?

This is why I'm voting for John Owens; he's pledged to not be involved …

by Max Rocket on Southern Durham Development gives $50K to developer's Super PAC (Triangulator)

© 2012 Independent Weekly • 302 E. Pettigrew St., Suite 300, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919 286 1972 • fax 919 286 4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation