Triangulator

The news blog of the Independent Weekly

Archives | RSS

Monday, March 30, 2009

SELC calls Jordan Lake boundary 'conservative'

Posted by Matt Saldaña on Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:46 PM

Citing conflicting data, the Southern Environmental Law Center, a Charlottesville, Va.-based advocacy group, has called on the Durham County Board of Commissioners to reject a developer-funded survey of Jordan Lake, and commission an independent survey of the reservoir. The group based its recommendation on data collected in 2007 for the N.C. Floodplain Mapping Program that show Jordan Lake extending beyond a margin set in the 1970s by U.S. Geological Survey maps.

The controversial developer-funded survey, by contrast, shows Jordan Lake contracting in the opposite direction, thus removing property owned at the time by private developer Neal Hunter from a protected area surrounding the reservoir. In letters to state and county officials, Hunter's associates have argued the survey--which Hunter commissioned in 2005--represents "better information" than the 1970s maps, and used the difference in mapping technologies as justification for bypassing a public hearing process required by state law to implement zoning map changes.

The 2007 data SELC presents was collected via a technology known as Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR), used by NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to analyze topography. In a March 20 letter (PDF), SELC Staff Attorney Kay Bond notes that the LiDAR data "cannot substitute for an on-the-ground-survey" such as Hunter's, but "can give an accurate enough approximation of actual conditions to indicate whether the conclusions reached by a survey are generally valid."

Bond implies that Hunter's survey--which only analyzed the portion of Jordan Lake affecting his property--may not be completely accurate:

Based on these maps, it appears that the original Jordan Lake boundary recognized by USGS is a conservative one. These maps call into question the surveys submitted by the City of Durham in support of its request to adjust the watershed boundary for Jordan Lake.

View a PDF of SELC's maps, which include Neal Hunter's 2005 survey, and the original U.S.G.S. survey, here.

Tags: , ,

Comments (5)

Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

[...] the data than was actually given. Like many powerful tools, GIS will have to be used with care. Differences in analysis and interpretation can lead to many disputes that need not arise. However, when used well, surprising and good [...]

report   
Posted by Who Gets Those Data?—Questions of Availability for Databases Underlying GIS Products | North Carolina Journal of Law and Technology on February 25, 2010 at 10:27 PM

Another, perhaps more important, technical problem with the Hunter map is the short length of the survey line. The line formed by the intersection of the lake surface and the ground is geometrically very complex - a scribbled zig-zag of a line. Mathematical smoothing is required to identify the position of a trendline, and it is this smoothed line that is used to define the critical watershed boundary. A short survey only tells you the position and trend of a single zig, not the average for that side of the lake. A much longer survey line - like the proposed independent survey of the entire lake - is needed to confidently identify the position and trend of the smoothed boundary line.

report   
Posted by Kathi Beratan on April 1, 2009 at 12:40 PM

The SELC obtained a LIDAR analysis at 216 feet (meaning ground at 216 feet above sea level) and one at a much more generous 215 feet (which would define the lake at even lower ground). Even the 215 map shows the lake extending beyond the CURRENT maps, contradicting Hunter's results. Note that the SELC says that the lidar measurements are accurate to within 10 inches. The map at 215 feet, therefore, allows a full foot of error -- essentially eliminating any error with the 216 foot map. This is undeniable evidence that a new, truly independent survey could very well show very different lake boundaries...

report   
Posted by ILoveDurham on March 31, 2009 at 12:38 PM

Wasn't the Hunter survey performed during the DROUGHT-OF RECORD???????? I seem to remember several notes to that effect in the botanical survey that I read. Liz Pullman 31 March 2009

report   
Posted by Liz Pullman on March 31, 2009 at 12:05 PM

The LIDAR map contains thousands of data points. Hunter's survey has 16, with a 600-foot gap between two of them. As they say on TV, "questions have been raised."

report   
Posted by Steve Bocckino on March 31, 2009 at 11:47 AM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

Latest in Triangulator

Author Archives

  • Storied bar He's Not Here is for sale (a remembrance)

    After realizing He's Not Here was neither a band nor a spiritual movement but a bar, the myth didn't disappear. I couldn't find it: The address-less place was like a treehouse in someone's backyard, or more appropriately, a speakeasy.
    • Jan 18, 2012
  • More »

Facebook Activity

Twitter Activity

Read indyweek's Tweets

Comments

For their next takeover target, I suggest the anarchists check out these sites:

http://www.ci.chapel-hill.nc.us/index.aspx…

They …

by Michael Czeiszperger on In "Carrboro Commune" CVS takeover, no arrests, no SWAT team, plenty of controversy (Triangulator)

@as400_guru--and yet being compared to the Tea Party is still the bigger insult.

@sensiblemoderate and runawayslave--it's Carrboro. Chilton represents …

by Mae on In "Carrboro Commune" CVS takeover, no arrests, no SWAT team, plenty of controversy (Triangulator)

© 2012 Independent Weekly • 302 E. Pettigrew St., Suite 300, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919 286 1972 • fax 919 286 4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation