INDY Week's news blog

Archives | RSS

Saturday, October 25, 2008

N&O: Realtors slime Stan Norwalk. (1)

Posted by on Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 2:10 PM

Good story, across the top of page 1, in the Old Reliable: The N.C. Association of Realtors is going all-out to trash Wake County Commissioners candidate Stan Norwalk, and it's not letting the facts get in its way.

The Indy, as you know, endorsed Norwalk -- he's running against incumbent Commissioner Kenn Gardner -- in no small part because of Stan's willingness to take on the Realtors and other powerful development interests. (2)

[The Realtors also fired a volley at state Rep. Ty Harrell, another Indy endorsee, as the N&O article reports.]

Now, for some footnotes to our entry:

1. In reality, the N&O's headline doesn't use the word "slime." (It says "rips" instead.) We thought you should know that, so we're noting it here.

We offer this in contrast to the faux quote and bogus footnote used by the N.C. Realtors PAC in one of the anti-Norwalk mailers. The mailer cites the N&O for its assertion that Norwalk has a "shady" past concerning campaign contributions (the word "shady" is highlighted in red). And to further convey the idea that the mailer is actually quoting the N&O, the assertion is accompanied by a red footnote (1), with this tagline immediately beneath it: "The News and Observer (sic), (Raleigh, NC), May 8, 2002 Wednesday, FINAL EDITION."

Note that the tagline isn't offered as an official (1) explanatory footnote, however. Because that could be considered fibbing.

The truth, according to the N&O itself in a sidebar to the main story:

"The N&O never called Norwalk's actions shady.

2. From the Indy's Norwalk endorsement:

"He has a record of advocating for alternatives to property tax—he lobbied the legislature hard to get the highly unpopular land transfer tax referendum option passed, showing he has no interest in ingratiating himself to the developers' lobby. But on other forms of spending, Norwalk is tight-fisted. He questions the necessity of a $30 million administrative headquarters and believes the county could save money by consolidating duplicate services."

Tags: , , ,

Pin It


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in News

More by Bob Geary

Facebook Activity

Twitter Activity


Is there a Park Circle Drive?

by chiburbbi on The Frontier launches new way of working at Research Triangle Park (News)

Well, 800 Park Circle Drive, unlike 300,400, 500, 600 and 700, is occupied.

by Lisa Sorg, INDY Editor on The Frontier launches new way of working at Research Triangle Park (News)

Latest videos from the INDY

© 2015 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation