N.C. Senate Has Crazy New Scheme to Avoid Cleaning Up Jordan Lake, Would Repeal Protective Buffers Along Waterways | News
News
INDY Week's news blog

Archives | RSS

Wednesday, June 1, 2016

N.C. Senate Has Crazy New Scheme to Avoid Cleaning Up Jordan Lake, Would Repeal Protective Buffers Along Waterways

Posted by on Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:57 AM

click to enlarge Freshwater Mussels - CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE
  • Creative Commons License
  • Freshwater Mussels
SolarBees utterly failed to do anything to clean up nutrient-polluted Jordan Lake but the North Carolina Senate has another trick up its sleeve—anything to avoid actually spending the money needed to clean up a reservoir that provides drinking water to 300 thousand people.

A provision in the Senate budget unveiled yesterday earmarks $500 thousand from the state's Clean Water Management Trust to study whether freshwater mussels can be used to clean up the Jordan and Falls reservoirs and other polluted water bodies.

An interim report on the study would be due in March 2017, and a final report due in May 2018.

The North Carolina Conservation Network says this new proposal  and other budget provisions "largely eschew science-based management strategies in favor of unproven tactics."

"Introducing non-native freshwater mussels into North Carolina's lakes would be a recipe for disaster, and is no substitute for controlling pollution at the source," said Upper Neuse Riverkeeper Matthew Starr in a statement. "These provisions are just another attempt by the legislature to delay any actual clean up. It's a waste of money."

Other budget provisions block attempts to restore water quality and prevent fish kills in Jordan and Falls Lake and in other water bodies across the state, including repealing wastewater treatment upgrades, controls on runoff from developments and farms, and protections for riparian buffers along state waterways.

Scientists regard vegetative buffers as the most cost-effective and fair means of controlling polluted runoff from farms and developments; the Senate budget would have them repealed and would schedule the repeal of state requirements for buffers along the Neuse River, the Tar-Pamlico River, the Catawba River on December 31, 2019— even if no alternative is in place.  

“This provision isn’t a tweak, it’s a sledgehammer," said Molly Diggins, state director of the North Carolina Sierra Club in a statement. "It is as if the Senate has forgotten how important our waterways are for tourism, recreation, and drinking water.”

Here's a list of several of the bad things the Senate budget proposes to do to the state's environment from the N.C. Conservation Network's policy director Grady McCallie:

· Section 14.13 attacks North Carolina’s nutrient management strategies, packages of rules designed to restore water quality and prevent massive fish kills in the Neuse estuary, Tar-Pamlico estuary, Jordan lake, and Falls lake. Jordan and Falls reservoirs are water sources for, respectively, over 300 thousand and over 400 thousand residents of the Triangle.

· The provision blocks all implementation of the Jordan and Falls rules through December 2019, and repeals all four strategies at that date.

· In the meantime, the provision earmarks $500 thousand in Clean Water Management Trust Fund dollars to fund a study of in-lake alternatives to controlling pollution at the source. Just last month, the Environmental Management Commission (EMC) concluded, in a report required by SL2015-246 last year, that in-lake treatment doesn’t work and isn’t a substitute for controlling pollution upstream at the source.

· Also throwing good money after bad, the provision concedes that SolarBees didn’t work, but then earmarks another $500 thousand from the Clean Water Management Trust Fund to study whether freshwater mussels can be used to clean up Jordan and Falls reservoirs.

· The provision requires the EMC to adopt new rules based on the new in-lake study, as a part of ‘rules readoption’, but on a schedule that is completely inconsistent with the ongoing readoption schedule, with temporary rules in place by December 2019. The Department of Environmental Quality is directed to run a time-consuming stakeholder process starting in December 2016, even as the provision discards the results of all four long-running stakeholder negotiations that created the current rule sets.

· The premise for the provision – that North Carolina’s four nutrient management strategies have not worked and will not work – is false. The strategies have reduced nitrogen and phosphorus pollution input where they have been implemented, and already conditions are not as bad as they were in the estuaries in the late 1990's. If the rules are fully implemented – particularly in Jordan and Falls lakes – conditions will continue gradually to improve.

"Provisions in this bill would repeal all four of the pollution management strategies, as well as water quality protections in the Catawba basin, and around Randleman reservoir in the Triad," McCallie said in a statement. "Where these rules have been implemented, they reduce pollution. Repealing them would harm water quality across North Carolina and would violate the federal Clean Water Act."

Tags: , , , , , ,

Pin It

Comments (5)

Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in News



Twitter Activity

Comments

So, in other words, regulations that protect drinking water, air, healthcare, and working class citizens are bad, but regulations that …

by StarSword on HB 500 Sponsor: Wholesalers “Made Clear They Weren’t Going to Discuss” Raising Barrel Cap (News)

Hopefully, light rail will die before very much is spent on it. As noted by gmbmnc, computer-driven vehicles will completely …

by Mark Bahner on The Durham-Orange Light Rail Now Costs More Than $3 Billion, and Durham Will Have to Pay More of It (News)

Most Recent Comments

So, in other words, regulations that protect drinking water, air, healthcare, and working class citizens are bad, but regulations that …

by StarSword on HB 500 Sponsor: Wholesalers “Made Clear They Weren’t Going to Discuss” Raising Barrel Cap (News)

Hopefully, light rail will die before very much is spent on it. As noted by gmbmnc, computer-driven vehicles will completely …

by Mark Bahner on The Durham-Orange Light Rail Now Costs More Than $3 Billion, and Durham Will Have to Pay More of It (News)

"The Cookerys Nick Johnson and his wife bought and renovated..."
I suggest editing Mrs. Nick Jonson's to Rochelle Johnson. …

by dawnbland on Awesome-Sounding Film and Food Hub Going into a Building on West Chapel Hill Street (News)

This guy from the wholesalers group blames flat state excise tax revenues on 38 breweries ? Give me a break. …

by Allen Oakley on The N.C. Wholesalers Association Says Barrel Cap Bill Won't Help Breweries, Attacks Them Anyway (News)

It is just like the Cuban missile crisis IF.....

1.) Cuba was thousands of miles away

2.) Cuba …

by MichyMitch on The Morning Roundup: North Korea Is Becoming Trump’s Cuban Missile Crisis (News)

© 2017 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation