NC Supreme Court hears case debating sex offenders, social networking | News
News
INDY Week's news blog

Archives | RSS

Monday, September 8, 2014

NC Supreme Court hears case debating sex offenders, social networking

Posted by on Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 3:34 PM

The North Carolina Supreme Court today heard oral arguments from a pair of lawyers debating whether or not a Durham sex offender committed a crime when he logged onto Facebook under a pseudonym and praised Jesus.

The man, Lester Packingham Jr., who had sexual intercourse with a 13-year-old when he was 21, had been prohibited from accessing any social networking site under a North Carolina law passed in 2008. But in 2010, Packingham, then 29, posted a religious message on his Facebook page after beating a traffic ticket: "Man God is Good! How about I got so much favor they dismissed the ticket before court even started. no fine. No court cost, no nothing spent....Praise be to GOD, WOW! Thanks, JESUS!"

The INDY covered the case last May, when it was up before the Court of Appeals.

Packingham's true identity was discovered by the Durham Police Department, and he was convicted for use of a commercial social networking site. But Packingham appealed and last year won his case after a unanimous panel of judges determined that the social networking ban infringed on the First Amendment rights of sex offenders.

"[W]e conclude that N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-202.5 is not narrowly tailored, is vague, and fails to target the “evil” it is intended to rectify," wrote the judges in their opinion. "Instead, it arbitrarily burdens all registered sex offenders by preventing a wide range of communication and expressive activity unrelated to achieving its purported goal."

The State appealed to the Supreme Court, paving the way for today's hearing. A decision should be handed down sometime in the next several months.  

Tags: , , , , ,

Pin It

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in News



Twitter Activity

Most Recent Comments

I'm honestly surprised. I had expected that he would only accept if the vote flipped.

by AgentDani on Breaking: Pat McCrory Concedes Governor's Race (News)

Thank you Councilwoman Jillian Johnson for your powerful courage to speak out the truth for us all who do not …

by Mariam Whitelle on Durham Councilwoman: Why Are Cops Involved in Frank Clark Shooting Still on Force? (News)

Energy Transfer Partners said this changes nothing and they're going to drill anyway -- http://bsnorrell.blogspot.com/2016/12/live…

That …

by Jon Howell on The Morning Roundup: Profiles in Courage (News)

Impeach Judge Michael Denning. Does anyone find it very odd that Judge Michael Denning has not been impeached as a …

by Justice in the Courts on Wake County Judge Michael Denning: 'China Wouldn't Be So Bad If It Weren't for All the Chinese' (News)

Of course there was no evidence. We're in a post-fact world, doncha know? And one person saying there could be …

by canesfan on State Board of Elections Throws McCrory a Lifejacket (News)

Comments

I'm honestly surprised. I had expected that he would only accept if the vote flipped.

by AgentDani on Breaking: Pat McCrory Concedes Governor's Race (News)

Thank you Councilwoman Jillian Johnson for your powerful courage to speak out the truth for us all who do not …

by Mariam Whitelle on Durham Councilwoman: Why Are Cops Involved in Frank Clark Shooting Still on Force? (News)

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation