Durham council to consider granting 751 South utilities at Feb. 20 meeting | News | Indy Week
News
INDY Week's news blog

Archives | RSS

Thursday, February 9, 2012

Durham council to consider granting 751 South utilities at Feb. 20 meeting

Posted by on Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:57 PM

This post has been modified from its original form. See deletions and italicized phrases below.

Despite initial plans to wait until a civil lawsuit was over, Durham's City Council has now decided it will consider at a meeting Feb. 20 whether to grant utilities to Southern Durham Development. The company wants to build 751 South, a large mixed-use project in southwest Durham controversial in part because of its proximity to Jordan Lake.

The council met during a closed session Thursday with City Attorney Patrick Baker to consider a request from SDD to grant water lines and the use of storm drainage and sewer systems for the project. Baker said the session was not public because he was providing legal advice to the council covered by attorney-client privilege.

SDD made the original request in April 2010, but city council members decided in August 2011 that they wanted to wait until a civil lawsuit related to the development had been resolved. A judge recently dismissed the lawsuit the plaintiffs, Chancellor's Ridge Homeowners Association, brought against Durham County. The plaintiffs announced they would appeal.

In the meeting, council members indicated that they wanted to delay their decision until after the appeals process had concluded. The council isn't bound by its August decision and is free to change course, Baker said Thursday.

The council also isn't required to hold a public hearing on the utility extension agreement, Baker said. The council could opt to allow public comment at the meeting, and could vote on that date, or defer the matter.

But the application has already been deferred by 21 months, Cal Cunningham, an attorney for SDD, pointed out in a recent letter to Baker (PDF). The company paid the appropriate fees to the city when it filed the application in April 2010, Cunningham wrote, and the application materials indicated a decision would be made within five months.

SDD had originally asked the council to consider annexing the 167 acres on which 751 South would be built. Becoming part of the city limits would entitle the property to services such as water, wastewater treatment, police and fire services. But a city analysis determined that the city could potentially spend as much as $1 million by providing services to the property before the tax revenue from the project would help the city break even.

When it became evident the numbers wouldn't add up in the city's favor, SDD changed its request. Instead of asking for annexation, it just asked the city to consider providing provide water, stormwater and sewer services without annexation. That's the request discussion that was tabled in August, and is now coming before council again Feb. 20.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Pin It

Comments

Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in News



Twitter Activity

Most Recent Comments

“Some of [Trump’s campaign aides] say a pro-fact-checking stance is really an anti-Trump stance.”

I… wait… so they admit… …

by Jon Howell on The Morning Roundup: Clinton-Trump Round One (News)

Keith Lamont Scott Fired Gun at Police in 2004

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/09/breaking-keith-scott-fired-gun-police-2005/ …

by Ayn Galt on N.C. Central Students Peacefully Rally After Keith Scott Shooting (News)

David you are an intelligent and articulate individual; that is a given as an individual who makes their living by …

by Xristos Magnos on Doomed Republican Congressional Candidates in Triangle Have Pretty Cool Signs (News)

The Cheech and Chong gif used along with this article reinforces outdated stereotypes about cannabis users. I would hope that …

by bdub on Good News, Bull City Stoners: The Durham City Council Moves Toward Marijuana Deprioritization (News)

Humm, let's see BCC ridership down after GoTriangle can't afford to go it alone and at Duke's direction drops Durham …

by Alex Cabanes on Light Rail, Bull City Connector to Take Center Stage at Durham Council Work Session Thursday (News)

Comments

“Some of [Trump’s campaign aides] say a pro-fact-checking stance is really an anti-Trump stance.”

I… wait… so they admit… …

by Jon Howell on The Morning Roundup: Clinton-Trump Round One (News)

Keith Lamont Scott Fired Gun at Police in 2004

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/09/breaking-keith-scott-fired-gun-police-2005/ …

by Ayn Galt on N.C. Central Students Peacefully Rally After Keith Scott Shooting (News)

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation