Durham Council votes unanimously against digital billboards | News | Indy Week
INDY Week's news blog

Archives | RSS

Monday, August 2, 2010

Durham Council votes unanimously against digital billboards

Posted by on Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:12 PM

It wasn’t the dozen pairs of blinking sunglasses or the parade of nonprofit groups pleading their cases, but a photo of the R. Kelly Bryant Jr. Bridge that may have made the biggest impact on the Durham City Council’s vote on digital billboards.

The graceful pedestrian bridge, which spans N.C. 147, serves as the eastern gateway to Durham and joins northern and southern neighborhoods that had been fractured by the highway. And posted near one of its ends is a billboard advertising the Dixie Gun & Knife Show happening this weekend in Raleigh.

The clash of these two landmarks underscored public and council concerns about the impact of digital billboards on aesthetics and property values—without any proven benefits to offset these social and financial costs. After more than three hours of public hearing and discussion, Durham City Council voted unanimously, 7-0, to keep the current billboard ordinance, which prohibits digital billboards.

Councilmembers had received more than 1,000 e-mails from the public in favor of keeping the current ordinance, which does not allow digital billboards. Less than 10 e-mails asked for a change to permit them.

"This issue has united Durham like no other," said Councilman Mike Woodard, shortly before voting to keep the current ordinance.

One of the 1,000 e-mails was from the bridge's namesake, who asked that Council keep the current ordinance.

"What are we going to do about that billboard?" asked Councilman Howard Clement.

Lewis Cheek, an attorney for K&L Gates, the firm representing Fairway Outdoor Advertising, noted erroneously that only by changing the ordinance could that billboard come down.

Councilwoman Diane Catotti contradicted Cheek, noting that the billboard could indeed be dismantled under the current ordinance—it just couldn’t be replaced.

"Durham has nothing to gain from [the change]," Catotti added.

The Indy will publish a longer piece in Wednesday;s paper analyzing the two-year fight over billboards. It will also be posted on indyweek.com.

Tags: , ,

Pin It

Comments (2)

Showing 1-2 of 2

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-2 of 2

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in News

Twitter Activity


Jim Anthony, who owns the property through an LLC, says above “I figured [the Durham GOP] would take responsibility for …

by obie84 on Is the Durham GOP’s New Headquarters Violating Zoning Laws? (News)

Good news for the surrounding neighborhoods. Wondering what the site plans are going to look like. Seems like they'll need …

by Fuzzsonic on Rejoice, Raleigh: Harris Teeter to Open in Seaboard Station (News)

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation