County attorney stalls ruling on DOT's land rejection; 751 vote expected Aug. 9 | News
News
INDY Week's news blog

Archives | RSS

Monday, July 26, 2010

County attorney stalls ruling on DOT's land rejection; 751 vote expected Aug. 9

Posted by on Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:56 PM

Picture_2.png

That burning question? Yep, still no answer.

After hearing three and a half hours of public views on the contentious 751 South development, Durham's county commissioners stalled a vote on whether to rezone the project's land until their Aug. 9 meeting. The postponement came just before midnight, and added another two weeks to a process that already has stretched more than two years as the public and commissioners have considered the huge mixed-use development proposed for 167 acres in south Durham near Jordan Lake.

County Attorney Lowell Siler requested the delay. He said he obtained at 5 p.m. legal papers that would determine how commissioners should proceed with the voting process, and had not had enough time to evaluate them. Those papers indicated that the N.C. Department of Transportation had revoked its earlier decision to accept a right-of-way from Southern Durham Development. The NCDOT stood by the validity of those documents, filed in Durham County court Monday afternoon. But Siler said he needed at least two more days to know for sure.

"There’s a great possibility that this document can do what the DOT says it’s supposed to do," Siler said. "I'm saying we haven’t had enough time to make a conclusive determination."

Whether that NCDOT document is legal and binding is a key factor in determining the validity of a formal petition citizens filed on the 751 South rezoning. (See earlier blog post on that matter)

If the document is sufficient, it would mean the citizens' petition is valid. And a valid protest petition would mean that four of five county commissioners would have to approve the rezoning request by Southern Durham Development for the project to move forward.

If the document is not sufficient, the petition would be invalid, and only a simple majority of the commissioners (three of five) must vote in support of the rezoning.

More than 70 people signed up to speak on the rezoning, with opponents outnumbering supporters by 10 speakers. Supporters of the development said it would create much-needed jobs and increased tax revenues for the city and county. Opponents cited concerns about traffic and the potential effects to the environment and water quality in Jordan Lake.

Several opponents also criticized the public process, which unfolded unpredictably in just the hours before the hearing.

The meeting was marked by bickering, not just among the audience members, who stood when chairs in the large county meeting room were full, but also amongst commissioners. They argued about whether to allow the county attorney to reveal his determination about the validity of the protest petition before the public hearing, or after. They argued about whether to proceed with a vote without considering the petition, after Commissioner Joe Bowser asked the board, just before midnight, to consider just moving forward with the vote under the assumption the petition was invalid.

"We cannot look the other way and say we’re going to pretend none of this happened and just go ahead," Commissioner Ellen Reckhow responded to Bowser. "I agree with the county attorney. We need to understand whether this is valid."

The commissioners agreed to continue the public hearing until August 9, meaning the public could still be invited to comment at that meeting, which also has a contentious issue on digital billboards on the same agenda.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Pin It

Comments (6)

Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in News



Twitter Activity

Most Recent Comments

There are currently 14 drivers officially signed up as plaintiffs in this case as of 12/9/16.

by Barry Mota on Uber Really, Really Doesn’t Pay Very Well, According to a Lawsuit Filed in North Carolina (News)

Yep, even rename of your business is e'er great solution to get better organisation. You may apply certain technical utility …

by Fred Alsberg Jr. on Carolina RailHawks Change Name, Announce Plans For MLS Bid (News)

That is not SE Raleigh.........

by arthurb3 on Raleigh Approves Oak City Outreach Center Funding (News)

Politics is the art of the possible. Sometimes the hardest thing for a political neophyte to withstand is only getting …

by Raymond Voigt on In Shock Move, Wake County Commissioner Jessica Holmes Resigns (News)

I'm honestly surprised. I had expected that he would only accept if the vote flipped.

by AgentDani on Breaking: Pat McCrory Concedes Governor's Race (News)

Comments

There are currently 14 drivers officially signed up as plaintiffs in this case as of 12/9/16.

by Barry Mota on Uber Really, Really Doesn’t Pay Very Well, According to a Lawsuit Filed in North Carolina (News)

Yep, even rename of your business is e'er great solution to get better organisation. You may apply certain technical utility …

by Fred Alsberg Jr. on Carolina RailHawks Change Name, Announce Plans For MLS Bid (News)

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation