Wake Co. judge dismisses case against execution protocol; death penalty nears in N.C. | News | Indy Week
News
INDY Week's news blog

Archives | RSS

Friday, May 15, 2009

Wake Co. judge dismisses case against execution protocol; death penalty nears in N.C.

Posted by on Fri, May 15, 2009 at 4:35 PM

Wake County Superior Court Judge Donald Stephens has issued an order (PDF, 896 KB) upholding the method North Carolina used to approve its death-penalty protocol, removing one of the final hurdles to resuming executions in the state. (See “De facto death penalty moratorium may end,” Independent Weekly, May 13, 2009.) The order rejects an appeal, filed by five death-row inmates, charging that the N.C. Council of State--a council of statewide elected officials--violated the Administrative Procedures Act when it approved the protocol in a single meeting closed to public comment. Stephens' ruling overturns an earlier decision, by Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) Judge Fred Morrison, ordering the Council of State to reconsider its decision--which the Council of State, in turn, rejected.

Essentially, Stephens found that the Administrative Procedures Act did not apply to the Council of State, because it was merely signing off on a protocol developed by the N.C. Department of Correction--itself not subject to the Rule Making and Contested Case Provisions of the Administrative Procedures Act. In other words, the development of an execution protocol--the means by which North Carolina kills its death-row inmates--can have no administrative oversight, outside the Council of State, and is not subject to normal administrative procedures, Stephens found.

The judge also ruled that the death-row inmates who filed the appeal are "not aggrieved persons with standing to challenge the approval of the protocol."

"There’s a division of two judges here," Mark Kleinschmidt, executive director of Fair Trial Initiative, and an attorney representing one of the inmates, said in an interview. "It’s certainly an issue that’s worthy of appeal—though we haven’t decided our next steps yet."

Earlier this week, the N.C. Senate passed a version of the North Carolina Racial Justice Act that would prevent the execution of defendants who can prove race was was an underlying factor in the decision to seek, or impose, the death penalty at the time of their trial. In an amendment introduced by Senate Minority Leader Phil Berger (R-Rockingham), the Council of State would be exempt from approving execution protocols--resolving the pending case before Stephens, and allowing executions to proceed unheeded. However, following Stephens' decision, that portion of the amendment appears to be moot.

Rep. Pricey Harrison (D-Guilford) said in an interview that Berger's amendment was "problematic," and that the House Judiciary I committee--where the bill is headed now--would attempt to restore the bill to its original, House version. In 2007, the House approved the Racial Justice Act--without language that would expedite executions--but the Senate voted it down.

Stephens has also set a court date for June 1 to hear arguments on whether the state protocol for executions--a lethal injection procedure--violates the Constitutional protection again cruel and unusual punishment.

Tags: ,

Pin It

Comments

Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in News

  • Dan Forest Says We "Misunderstand" HB 2

    Dan Forest Says We "Misunderstand" HB 2

    "Your question itself shows a misunderstanding of House Bill 2," Forest says.
    • Jul 22, 2016
  • Pat McCrory Has Lost It

    Pat McCrory Has Lost It

    McCrory blames a prominent fighter for LGBT equality for drawing attention to the stupid bill he signed.
    • Jul 22, 2016
  • The Morning Roundup: Be Afraid, Be Very Afraid

    The Morning Roundup: Be Afraid, Be Very Afraid

    Also: Hillary Clinton to announce a VP who will not be Elizabeth Warren, the NBA to move the All-Star Game to a city that is not Charlotte, and Black Lives Matter protesters shut down a street in Durham.
    • Jul 22, 2016
  • More »


Twitter Activity

Comments

Forest says "We will never value a dollar over a woman's or child's safety and security." Based on that statement …

by Michael Thomas on Charlotte Is Losing the All-Star Game (News)

I'd vote for ralph wiggum before I vote for McCory. In fact, I'd take any character in Springfield over the …

by David 2 on Pat McCrory Has Lost It (News)

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation