Wind turbines could be banned from mountains | Living Green | Indy Week
Pin It

Wind turbines could be banned from mountains 

click to enlarge living_green.jpg

N.C. lawmakers have passed the state budget and are packing their bags to bug out of Raleigh, but they've left some unfinished business for next year. Senate Bill 1068, which governs the placement and permitting of wind turbines—including a controversial ban on building them on mountain ridges—will likely have to wait until next year to move.

The Senate passed the bill last week and referred it to the House Committee on Energy and Energy Efficiency, which could take it up when the legislature reconvenes for the short session next May.

The bill sets a framework for building and permitting wind turbines along the coast, including studying potential ecological and environmental impacts and notifying adjacent property owners.

However, a contentious provision strengthens the state's 1983 "Ridge Law" by banning wind turbines taller than 100 feet from mountain ridges greater than 3,000 feet, known for their windy conditions. The reason? Turbine opponents think they're ugly, and ugly doesn't sell to the vast numbers of tourists clogging the Blue Ridge Parkway with their cars—which is no pretty picture, either.

Renewable energy proponents note the bill impedes N.C.'s glacial progress toward achieving its Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard. Two years ago, the legislature passed REPS after a protracted and testy battle that diluted the strength of the original bill. Nonetheless, state law now requires that N.C. electric public utility providers meet 12.5 percent of the state's energy demand through renewable energy generation or energy efficiency by 2021.

To see a list of members on the Energy and Energy Efficiency committee, go to bit.ly/132jQm. Appalachian State University has excellent resources on wind (www.wind.appstate.edu), as does the N.C. Sustainability Energy Association (www.ncsustainableenergy.org).

  • N.C. lawmakers bug out of Raleigh without resolving the placement and permitting of wind turbines.

Comments

Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Living Green



Twitter Activity

Comments

After a lot of hard work and dedication by Citizenre senior staff, Citizenre closed on $20 million in financing (

by ltaylor on Rent the sun's power (Living Green)

ROBOTICALLY GROW SOLAR `~'

Very large solar capacity will have to be mass produced by robotic assembly lines HERE …

by fireofenergy on Form a sun bloc at solar energy discussion (Living Green)

Most Read

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation