The first week of 2010 saw the two sides in the Wake schools diversity battle put the gloves on and the niceties aside.
On Tuesday, Jan. 5, the Wake County Board of Education, commanded since the fall elections by a conservative majority, abruptly decided—by the now-familiar 5-4 vote—to end "mandatory" assignments to year-round schools as of the 2010-11 school year.
The majority also decreed that socioeconomic status would no longer factor in the application process to attend year-round schools, a position at odds with the county's long-standing policy of maintaining diverse student populations in every school.
Both sides in the battle viewed it as a first step toward dismantling the diversity policy and moving Wake to a system of neighborhood schools.
Two days later, a rejuvenated Wake County Taxpayers Association, the conservative group led by former state Rep. Russell Capps, welcomed the new board members to its meeting as conquering heroes. "Keep your prayers up and pay attention," Wake school board member John Tedesco told them. "Because I promise you, there's more to come. We're just getting started."
At a pro-diversity rally on Sunday, the Rev. William Barber, president of the state NAACP, said his organization will take to the streets, as well as the courts, to prevent the resegregation of Wake schools. "This is the time to be vigilant," Barber thundered. "Not five years from now, not three years from now ... we need to draw a line in the sand right now."
The school board's action on Jan. 5 reversed the majority's posture in mid-December, when they seemed to accede to the timetable of Superintendent Del Burns: His schedule called for reviewing the issues on year-round schools through the spring, delaying major changes until at least 2011--12.
However, reprising the tactics they used at their inaugural meeting Dec. 1 (at which the five-person majority pulled eight surprise resolutions out of their pockets with no prior notice) the majority once again unveiled a resolution on year-round schools at the last minute and passed it immediately.
The majority's move caused an angry Keith Sutton, one of the four school board members kept in the dark, to ask why the resolution wasn't presented during a freewheeling committee of the whole session earlier in the day—when the meeting topic was an upcoming survey of parents' attitudes about year-round schools.
Sutton's question went unanswered. Similarly, when Carolyn Morrison, one of Sutton's allies, asked Deborah Prickett, the resolution's sponsor, how many classroom seats will be lost in the Wake system by the policy change, Prickett could only respond: "I do not have a number on that. I do know that our staff ... is competent enough to handle making those changes."
About 30 percent of the system's 140,000 students attend year-round elementary or middle schools. (There are no year-round high schools.) The year-rounds add capacity to an overcrowded school system by using buildings for 12 months, rather than the traditional nine. All students attend classes for the legally required 180 days, but on four separate, overlapping calendar tracks. Year-round students are off three weeks at a time, instead of being off all summer.
Debra Goldman, a Prickett ally (the others are Board Chairman Ron Margiotta, Chris Malone and Tedesco), said she thinks the change to year-rounds on a volunteer-only basis may add capacity: Only about 140 students were assigned to year-round schools this year and then kept in them after their parents applied for a traditional-calendar placement. On the other hand, Goldman said, some parents who applied for year-round placements for their children weren't given them, or else the school they were offered was too far from home.
The board's survey is intended to indicate which areas of the county should have more year-round schools and which could do with with fewer of them.
What wasn't clear from the board's resolution was whether students will continue to be assigned to year-rounds but assured of a traditional-calendar option as well—or whether year-rounds will be filled only by volunteers. And if there aren't enough volunteers, then what?
"Every effort will be made to accommodate families into the calendar of their choice, whether it is year-round or traditional, at a school within proximity of their residence," the resolution states.
Only after the resolution passed did anyone in the majority ask Burns how the new policy would work or what it might mean for the system's capacity. "How will this be implemented?" Goldman wanted to know. "I don't have an answer now as to how implementation will occur," a tight-lipped Burns answered.
Burns said he would get back to them as soon as possible.
Public comment in the meeting came afterward, and diversity supporters ripped the majority's high-handedness. "I think what we witnessed tonight was a travesty of democracy," Raleigh parent Chris Frey said. "We expect our students to do their homework. But this board has failed to do its homework."
Tthe roughly 80 folks at the Wake Taxpayers Association meeting in North Raleigh—all but one of them white—cheered lustily Thursday night when Prickett, Goldman, Malone and Tedesco took their turns at the microphone. Prickett said that, even in tough economic times when money for more schools is in short supply, all parents should be able to choose whether their children attend a traditional-calendar school or a year-round school.
"It's a moral issue to me," Prickett said. "We gave families back choice, and that's freedom."
The four discussed the tremendous pressure they're under: Goldman said she's been "yelled at" by audiences; Prickett said she felt like she was "in a fishbowl." Tedesco said the minority was fighting an entrenched educational bureaucracy and the established policies that it deploys "to trip us up, to tie us up, against doing the very basic thing we're supposed to do"—improve the county's educational performance.
Margiotta did not attend Thursday's meeting, avoiding any issues that might've been raised under the state's Open Meetings Law. (The statute sets rules for official public bodies whenever a majority of the members are together and discuss policy matters.) But Margiotta is well known to the Taxpayers Association as "Papa Ron," a man who for the last six years was the board's only conservative member but is suddenly its chair.
"Papa Ron is dead-on, folks," said Taxpayers Association board member Coye Cook, "don't you never underestimate him. And now he's got four people to stand solid behind him."
Cook and Capps each counseled the four new members to ignore public criticism or liberal outrage. Capps recalled the ridicule he received when, as a legislator, he introduced a bill to stop evolution from being taught in the public schools as fact. "If you do right," he told them, "the liberals are going to try to make something out of you."
Tedesco said he's ready to take the liberals on. His goal, he said, is to replace the existing school assignment policies, including any student transportation that's associated with diversity, with a policy based on community assignment zones. "Basically, you live in a zone, you go to school in your zone," he said.
To the 150 people—two-thirds of them black—who attended the NAACP-sponsored forum Sunday in Southeast Raleigh, sentiments like Tedesco's smacked of Jesse Helms' attacks on "busin'" during the civil rights era.
"Neighborhood schools" sounds good, said civil rights attorney Al McSurely, who is white, but many neighborhoods are still segregated, racially or by income levels. "The question is, how are they going to end 'forced busing' and have neighborhood schools and not resegregate? McSurely said.
Barber, the NAACP president, said courts have established under both the federal and state constitutions that children have a right to an equal education in an integrated school. The evidence is unequivocal, he argued, that children do worse in high-poverty schools. Trapping children in them is therefore unconstitutional.
"Separate cannot be equal," Barber declared, his finger pointed outward. "In this room," he said as the crowd cheered, "what we must make a commitment to do is fight for what is right."
Showing 1-5 of 6
Add a comment | All comments »
These differences of opinion over school board policy are really just a relavtively small part of a much larger struggle of personal freedom vs. the socialist / statist agenda of forced government coercion. The latter is certainly the model of most of the world's governments today, but OUR country was founded on the former. You cannot have freedom and equality. They are intrinsically antagonistic forces. An increase in one automatically reduces the other. The people who founded this country believed that freedom should be the ultimate goal of the society and an increasing number of people today are beginning to wake up and come around to the same viewpoint. We live in a world dominated by tyranny and coercion. There ought to be one nation on the planet that places personal liberty first and there's no better place for it than the only one that actually started out that way!
I think what the school board is doing is a good thing. I tried to apply for year-round and was denied because of diversity. Maybe people should focuse on what is going on in their neighborhood schools before deciding to bus them all over the county.
The school also needs to keep in mind that they serve the entire county not just Raleigh and Cary. Living in Southern Wake where there is no longer a Magnet and no Charters doesn't leave many options for the parents. I know folks in Raleigh are whining about Magnet schools losing their status well mine did and I fought it tooth and nail.
Schools need to be updated. The brand-new schools look great with all the computers, books and class rooms. Maybe we could try to update our older schools and make them year around and stop building. That migh save some money????
The Wake County school situation is a microcosm of a larger battle going on at the national level. I do not have kids, but if I did, I would be mad as hell if some I was told that my kids would have to be bused all over hells half-acre for the sake of diversity. I absolutely agree with brentf777 and his take on freedom and equality. What exactly is the ultimate goal of the current diversity policy? For the purposes of having the same number of white and black students in a school? Is this what everyone but me considers to be equality? The more one studies American social culture, the more clear it is that those who claim to be the agents of equality and defenders of civil liberties are actually the impetus keeping old divisions and perceived differences alive and well. Diversity is a state of mind, not a true reality. The paradox of the current diversity policy is that it does the opposite of what it is intended to do, which is create so-called equality. Diversity policies imply that there is something wrong with who you are based on some physical or cultural characteristic. People need to get beyond this and realize all humanity is equal in that every person possesses free will and unlimited potential. Policies that force a perception of differences among people are one of the most repressive forms of control. I hope people begin to realize this very soon or else your children will never know the joys and happiness in life that come with freedom and prosperity.
Very good and well articulated point. I completely agree. If you treat people as if they are "different" they will believe they are different and act accordingly. If we're going to have REAL equality, let's treat everyone equally. Let everyone play by the same rules.
Bob, I think you know John Tedesco. To characterize him as "ready to take liberals on" is unfair -- those are your words, not his. John has worked very hard to reach out to all groups, not to take them on, but to try and build some consensus.
Comments (6) RSS