The scoop on the vagrant van | Wake County | Indy Week
Pin It

The scoop on the vagrant van 

Americans for Prosperity opposes taxpayer-funded public transit. Yet the AFP Foundation has permanently parked its ice cream van in a park-and-ride lot for bus riders.

Photo by Lisa Sorg

Americans for Prosperity opposes taxpayer-funded public transit. Yet the AFP Foundation has permanently parked its ice cream van in a park-and-ride lot for bus riders.

Since at least June, an Americans for Prosperity Foundation ice cream van with Missouri plates has sat in the overcrowded District Drive park-n-ride lot in Raleigh. Wrapped in red, white and blue, with images of the American flag, the foundation website and a quote from Ronald Reagan, the van is always parked in the same place, indicating that it has rarely, if ever moved.

A freezer inside the truck does not appear to be on; a manual for a Frigidaire has been discarded on the floor.

This is not an innocuous ice cream truck playing "In the Good Ole Summertime" as it rolls down suburban streets. The Koch Brothers founded the AFP Foundation, a sister organization of Americans for Prosperity, a conservative free-market group. Both organizations have chapters throughout the United States, including in North Carolina.

AFP Foundation ice cream trucks have appeared at the group's events in Arkansas, Nevada and California.

In North Carolina, AFP received $1.6 million from the John William Pope Foundation, headed by Art Pope. Until he became deputy budget director under Gov. McCrory, Pope was one of the group's four directors. AFP has also worked to elect conservative lawmakers to the North Carolina legislature.

So how can a vehicle camp out in a park-and-ride lot for nearly three months without being towed? We called the state Department of Transportation and Triangle Transit to find out.

N.C. DOT owns the lot; the Division of Highways oversees it. As a public transportation agency, Triangle Transit can allow its passengers to use it, according to communications officer Brad Schulz.

But vehicles cannot live at these lots, said Jennifer Garifo, spokesperson for N.C. DOT.

She said state transportation officials would visit the lot this week, take down the plate number (7PS 779, expires August 2013), contact the owner and give him or her "a reasonable time to remove the vehicle."

If the owner fails to do that, then DOT "will have it removed," Garifo said.

Americans for Prosperity's North Carolina chapter did not return calls seeking comment.

Comments (3)

Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Wake County



Twitter Activity

Most Recent Comments

I think this is such a wonderful idea, but would love to know more about the location. The venerable Square …

by Gavin Watson on With Carroll’s Kitchen, a Raleigh Restauranteur Hopes to Empower the Disadvantaged (Wake County)

Based on having visited a number of friends at the Sir Walter over the years it is not quite accurate …

by Hank living downtown on When the Sir Walter Apartments Building Is Sold, Raleigh May Lose 140 Affordable Units (Wake County)

I spent some months this spring and summer looking for subsidized housing where I could retire on SSI income. While …

by Bill Robinson on When the Sir Walter Apartments Building Is Sold, Raleigh May Lose 140 Affordable Units (Wake County)

The republicans were voted into office in NC using the same voter laws they now want to change....Why are they …

by Tony D on Wake’s Early Voting Debate Illustrates Why It’s Time to Rethink Partisan Elections Boards (Wake County)

Yes. If course. That's correct. I'm not saying that U-238 is not a concern; obviously it is, or a maximum …

by ct on From 2010–2014, Wake County Found 40 Private Wells with Dangerous Levels of Uranium. Then It Stopped Testing. (Wake County)

Comments

I think this is such a wonderful idea, but would love to know more about the location. The venerable Square …

by Gavin Watson on With Carroll’s Kitchen, a Raleigh Restauranteur Hopes to Empower the Disadvantaged (Wake County)

Based on having visited a number of friends at the Sir Walter over the years it is not quite accurate …

by Hank living downtown on When the Sir Walter Apartments Building Is Sold, Raleigh May Lose 140 Affordable Units (Wake County)

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation