It wasn't intentional, they say. It never is.
But this group, financed entirely from taxpayer funds and on a very public mission, decided without much debate at all that it wasn't up to discussing issues or looking at plans along with the rest of us and voted 6-1 to do its work in secret.
The move led to the resignation of the lone objector, chair Bob Epting, who as a former elected official and an attorney for a number of public bodies has a firm grasp of the words and spirit of the state's open meeting laws.
For folks interested in the future of downtown Chapel Hill, the board's action was enlightening, as was the rather imperial response by board member J. Allen Fine, when asked by Epting why he wanted to do things in closed session. "Why not?" Fine replied.
While it's very, very un-Chapel Hill to suggest that anything unethical might be in the works, the fact that the corporation is populated by downtown property owners, university officials and a developer who has already said he might put a bid in on one of the town's downtown projects, requires an open process.
Unless there's a rapid change of heart, it doesn't look like that will come from the development corporation's board of directors. Which leaves it up to the Town Council to restore trust in the process.
Even before this latest incident, there were concerns raised that the new "vision" for downtown is based on the fantasy that Chapel Hill is something other than a college town and that Franklin Street can be turned into a quaint, funky, boutique-filled shopping mecca topped by half-million-dollar condos. The mantra is "too many bars and T-shirt shops," as if the market (the lion's share being the 30,000 young people who live within a mile of downtown) can be steered into spending more money on snazzy clothes and home furnishings.
Sorry gang, but that's folly, and any frosh at Kenan-Flagler could tell you so. Downtown Chapel Hill is a great hangout. The invisible hand isn't dialing Prada, it's trying to signal the bartender that it wants another beer and maybe some wings. Slip into closed session and debate that.
- To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
- To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
- To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
- Proper web addresses will automatically become links.
Latest in Editorial
-
Strike down the discriminatory driver's licenses
In issuing these pink driver's licenses, emblazoned with the words "no lawful status" (which isn't true), Republicans want to elicit fear from as well as punish North Carolina's undocumented immigrants.
- Mar 6, 2013
-
When nipples are outlawed, only outlaws will have nipples
This is what's way out of hand: A measure like House Bill 34 passes for governance under the new regime.
- Feb 13, 2013
-
A very expensive race in Senate District 18
If Barefoot defeats Berger, the Republicans will have effectively bought a seat, a vote in general for their far-right agenda and specifically for Stam.
- Oct 3, 2012
- More »
More by Kirk Ross
-
Unlike Oz, the Legislature is all-powerful
In this state, the Legislature creates not just the game and the rules, but the players themselves.
- Mar 20, 2013
-
Beware the bright shiny objects of the General Assembly
When the mackerel are running, you take a shiny metal spoon with a hook on it and cast it in the water. It's a decent metaphor for the viral interaction of social media and outrageous legislation.
- Apr 17, 2013
- More »
