Students lose in alleged money-skimming scheme at NCCU | Durham County | Indy Week
Pin It

Students lose in alleged money-skimming scheme at NCCU 

Nan Coleman (left), former director of NCCU's Historically Minority Colleges and Universities Consortium; Beverly Washington Jones (right), former NCCU provost

Nan Coleman (left), former director of NCCU's Historically Minority Colleges and Universities Consortium; Beverly Washington Jones (right), former NCCU provost

Cheryl Thomas is trained in scrutiny, in fitting puzzling details together until they make sense. So when Thomas, a licensed private investigator and the single parent of a teenage boy, felt uneasy about a mentoring program where she was sending her son, she started to ask questions.

"I knew something was not right," she said. "I guess it's just the investigator in me. It's with me all the time."

Thomas' son, CJ, enrolled in the African American Male Leadership Academy (AAMLA), administered by N.C. Central University in 2005, the same year he entered high school. The program was supposed to push African-American boys to greater academic and social successes, exposing them to new opportunities and prepping them for college. It started well, but soon lost momentum. There was discord and disorganization inside the grant-funded program, Thomas said. Trips and tutoring sessions were cancelled, and some mentors were absent when they were supposed to be regularly contacting students.

"The program was dysfunctional," Thomas said. "There was no order. No one could give you answers. And answers started changing."

Thomas requested detailed budget information from the program's director, Nan Coleman, but she received inadequate documentation. In 2008, Thomas rounded up fellow parents and they asked NCCU to audit the program. As it turns out, something was, indeed, not quite right—not just with the program CJ was in, but with the entire NCCU-led initiative overseeing the mentoring project.

Coleman, the director of the NCCU Historically Minority Colleges and Universities Consortium, allegedly siphoned more than $1 million into a secret bank account, withdrawing thousands of dollars at ATMs, writing herself checks and even shopping at clothing, jewelry and makeup stores, according to a state audit released last month. The investigation also indicates former NCCU provost Beverly Washington Jones received almost $62,000 from the account, even though she told auditors she didn't recall providing any services to the program outside her duties as provost. (Lawyers for both Coleman and Jones declined the Indy's requests for interviews.)

But as chatter about the report circulates in the NCCU community and beyond, Thomas and other parents say they weren't surprised to hear the accusations.

"I knew it would come out eventually that things weren't right," said Cynthia McEachin, a Durham teacher who also enrolled her son in AAMLA.

The mentoring program was one of several programs Coleman oversaw as director of the now-defunct consortium, a partnership between a dozen historically black colleges and universities in North Carolina and the N.C. Department of Public Instruction. Created in 1999, the program sought grant funding for programs that could help close the well documented achievement gap between minority students and their white counterparts. NCCU served as headquarters for the statewide effort.

The AAMLA offered tutoring, trips to college campuses, leadership development, internships and educational tools such as graphing calculators and laptop computers. Several parents said that in 2005, both Coleman and Jones also promised full scholarships to students who stayed in the program for the four years of high school—a statement they say Coleman later denied making.

Initially, students received tutoring, practiced public speaking at events and traveled to state historic sites. They even attended a luncheon with professionals in Research Triangle Park, riding to the corporate offices in limousines, said Derrick Best, whose son enrolled in the academy during its first year.

Yet the program began to unravel. Parents say that as early as 2006 they were disappointed by unreliable mentors and cancelled events. When they pressed Coleman for information, they received unsatisfactory answers. Coleman frequently hired and fired program leaders. In one year, there were as many as three different coordinators, parents said.

They also said Coleman was quick to sideline anyone who questioned the program's effectiveness or her management. In a 2007 email obtained by the Indy, a mentor urged changes to the structure of the program.

"Promises were made, however plans were not created and implemented to secure the promises," he wrote. "We are all responsible for this failure, from the chancellor to the provost ... We need to be less concerned about protecting our image as an academy ... and actually get down to business of helping the guys in our charge."

In the lengthy email, the mentor suggested a number of changes, including involving the university in matters regarding the program's finances and personnel.

"Since you have such strong negative feelings about the academy, the progress it has made, and future direction under the leadership of someone else" Coleman wrote in an August 2007 response, "I am relieving you of your responsibilities as a mentor and tutor in the African American Male Leadership Academy immediately ... The problem ... is that you have your own VISION, which may not be aligned with the objectives of the FUNDING AGENCY." (Emphasis is Coleman's.)

The mentor also asked to be compensated beyond the roughly $10,000 he was receiving for tutoring and mentoring. It's unclear which mentors and tutors were paid through the program, and which were volunteers. In her response, Coleman notes that while mentors aren't generally paid for services, she had "been very generous" with those who worked for the program. But Thomas, one of the parents, said some mentors told her they were spending their own money for activities such as taking the students out to eat. Meanwhile, mentors who weren't familiar to the parents or students had allegedly picked up paychecks from the program office, Best said.

The state audit doesn't mention specific problems with accounting in the academy.

Thomas said that by 2008 she was fed up. She called unofficial meetings with other parents, and they started writing letters to state and local officials. In October of that year, one of those letters landed on the desk of NCCU Chancellor Charlie Nelms, who arrived at NCCU the previous year.

"The program has failed the young adults it was created for," the parents wrote. They asked for a meeting with Nelms and an audit of the program or they would take their complaints to the UNC Board of Governors. They didn't get that far. Nelms initiated an internal audit that pointed beyond the academy, to a much bigger problem. According to the state investigation, Coleman opened the private account in 2004 and began diverting income from a separate consortium program—a for-profit tutoring operation—into the account.

The tutoring program was a state-approved provider of Supplemental Educational Services, a type of academic support offered under federal law to specific groups of students in low-performing schools. The services are free to families and are paid for by federal funds allocated to school districts. Parents choose from among several providers of the after-school tutoring, and the districts pay the providers directly. Tutors are typically current or retired teachers working part-time to earn extra money.

The program, which operated under the consortium, was eligible to tutor students in as many as 20 school districts beginning in 2004, according to records of the N.C. Department of Public Instruction. Just how many districts used the program is yet undetermined, as individual school districts keep their own records of the services. In their audit, state investigators said they could not "easily quantify" how much money the program brought in while Coleman was in charge. Auditors did state, however, that the money in Coleman's private bank account was revenue from the tutoring program.

Locally, records from the Durham Public Schools show that from 2007 to 2009, during Coleman's tenure, the district paid the consortium almost $520,000 for tutoring for 2,271 students at several elementary schools. The district continued using the services in 2010–11, but Coleman was no longer in charge of the program.

McEachin, the mother of one teenager who participated in the AAMLA, is also a speech therapist for Durham Public Schools. She said she worked part-time as a tutor for the consortium tutoring program during the 2008–09 school year. The program was disorganized, McEachin said, and she and other teachers didn't receive their pay on time. Several tutors quit because of the irregularities, McEachin said.

"I don't understand why everything they put their hands on was a mess," McEachin said. "Here are people with [advanced] degrees who had been in education forever. It wasn't like they didn't know how federal funding was supposed to work."

With access to 190 boxes of records and a 60-page audit to consider, it could be weeks or even months before authorities, including the Durham district attorney and the Internal Revenue Service, determine whether to file civil and criminal charges against Coleman, Jones and others who may have received unwarranted cash from consortium accounts. The taxpayers, the university and NCCU's partners are not the only ones who might have been bilked; it's also the students the program was charged with helping.

"This program really could have been some help to these black boys," McEachin said. "If they had been really dedicated to finding good mentors for these boys, this program really could have gone far."

Comments

Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Durham County



Twitter Activity

Most Recent Comments

I will never, ever live in another neighborhood that has an HOA. It's not even up for debate.
I already …

by mike_in_nc on Does North Carolina give homeowners associations too much power? (Durham County)

I would not buy or invest in a development that did not have an HOA. That after having made the …

by 669283 on Does North Carolina give homeowners associations too much power? (Durham County)

I've never lived in a house built more recently than 1976, so I have no personal experience with HOAs. I …

by David 1 on Does North Carolina give homeowners associations too much power? (Durham County)

Why any home buyer would voluntarily want another layer of bureaucratic control upon them, by buying into an HOA....just say …

by Michael Gary on Does North Carolina give homeowners associations too much power? (Durham County)

Comments

I will never, ever live in another neighborhood that has an HOA. It's not even up for debate.
I already …

by mike_in_nc on Does North Carolina give homeowners associations too much power? (Durham County)

I would not buy or invest in a development that did not have an HOA. That after having made the …

by 669283 on Does North Carolina give homeowners associations too much power? (Durham County)

Most Read

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation