Stop scapegoating poor whites | Letters to the Editor | Indy Week
Pin It

Stop scapegoating poor whites 

In the "The White People Problem" (Citizen, Jan. 6), Bob Geary says, "Progressives need to convince poor whites to vote in their own self-interest." This line of argument circulates in progressive circles: that poor whites are bewilderingly irrational, uneducated about their own situation and/or misinformed about their "economic self-interest." This reenacts painful classism—haven't Appalachians and West Virginians had enough of being showcased for poverty and ignorance by liberals? And, this scapegoating obscures how racism and capitalism operate on a systemic level. It is primarily white, owning-class people who hold the power to pass racist policies at the Capitol, implement racist hiring practices, incarcerate black, brown and poor white people, and train police to shoot to kill. Clearly, racism is not just a poor-white-people problem.

And, suppose that poor white people were motivated mainly by their own economic interest: What would it take politically to end poverty? Historically, capitalism and neoliberalism have run rampant across the country under the leadership of both parties, squeezing every last cent of productive value out of the working class. Are owning- and professional-class progressives ready to give up class prejudices and share power with working-class people—of all races—in order to create systemic change?

Furthermore, the theory that human beings are primarily or only motivated by economic self-interest is false. People are moved all the time by many different needs—dignity, stability, family, faith and belonging, as well as by economic considerations. People are not economic machines, nor should we be. Progressives would do well to keep this in mind if they hope to build a movement for real change.

Laurin Penland, Noah Rubin-Blose and Kriti Sharma, Hillsborough

Latest in Letters to the Editor

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor



Twitter Activity

Most Recent Comments

If the headline had been: "Is Scott Crawford Better Off Without Standard Food"? The answer would have been a resounding …

by Sue Mixson on Plate Expectations (Letters to the Editor)

Emma Laperruque and your response to this situation have been very unprofessional. Seeing the way both your organization and she …

by TayWoo on Plate Expectations (Letters to the Editor)

Please, Mr. Keen, inform us on what kind of person Hilary Clinton is. But please leave out the innuendo, unsupported …

by GorSun on Smug Revisionism (Letters to the Editor)

Thank you cleverweist1 and Cristel Gutshchenritter Orrand for the opportunity to stand up for what I believe in as a …

by half full on A Massive Scar (Letters to the Editor)

Mr Pollock makes some good points .
Noam Chomsky and Ron Paul have similar views on wars we have waged …

by CHHS Tiger on History you won't like either (Letters to the Editor)

Comments

If the headline had been: "Is Scott Crawford Better Off Without Standard Food"? The answer would have been a resounding …

by Sue Mixson on Plate Expectations (Letters to the Editor)

Emma Laperruque and your response to this situation have been very unprofessional. Seeing the way both your organization and she …

by TayWoo on Plate Expectations (Letters to the Editor)

Most Read

  1. Stepping Out (Peripheral Visions)
  2. Intellectual Honesty (Letters to the Editor)
  3. Off Season (Peripheral Visions)
  4. Tu Quoque (Letters to the Editor)

© 2017 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation