Pin It
"I, the volunteer described, find several parts of the story need to be corrected in order to accurately describe the occurrences."

Re: May Becker 

In response to the article "Orange Commissioners decline to reappoint planning board member over residency questions" (July 27), I, the volunteer described, find several parts of the story need to be corrected (including descriptions related to my residency) in order to accurately describe the occurrences.

I was informed by the County Attorney that he finds I meet qualifications of an Orange County resident (to serve on the county boards) and that he expects I would not hear more about the issue (after he asked some questions, which I openly and completely answered). Then, after a Planning Board meeting in which I voiced dissenting opinions regarding environmental issues, I received unrelated questions regarding personal out-of-state property records, communication that the County Manager would report information about me to other authorities, and the suggestion that I resign or be removed from the boards. None of the issues raised by the County Manager or County Attorney were relevant, and it was confirmed that none of them needed to be addressed. I was also informed by county staff that I am eligible for reappointment and was asked if I would like to be considered for a second term.

When I expressed my concerns to county commissioners, I was told that the topic would not be discussed with me because discussions were held in closed session. I have since been advised that issues related to board membership are to be held openly and that it is improper to have them in closed sessions.

I am concerned that law-abiding members of volunteer boards are treated in an inappropriate, aggressive and insulting way by paid county employees and/or elected officials. I received many comments from others voicing similar concerns and believe it is important—and have been encouraged to—bring forth the concerns and occurrences publicly.

May Becker
Chapel Hill

Comments (0)

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor

  • Re: Climate change; clean energy

    "Duke, Exxon and the Koch Brothers may be turning up the heat, but they're also investing in political power and public relations (i.e. lies)."
    • May 8, 2013
  • Re: Climate change

    "I have found the climate movement here to be not only alive and well, but growing and gaining momentum."
    • May 1, 2013
  • Re: Renewable energy; Goathouse Refuge

    "Sadly, House Bill 298, which rolls back our Renewable Energy Portfolio Standards requirement, passed through the House commerce subcommittee by a narrow margin."
    • Apr 10, 2013
  • More »

Facebook Activity

Twitter Activity

Read indyweek's Tweets

Comments

Following what I also agree was a rather one sided article, I am pleased to see comments in support of …

by Helen Needham on Re: Goathouse Refuge (Letters to the Editor)

The Democrats are cheating my kids out of a life of freedom and liberty!

by Sheila Barber on Re: Political reporting; fracking; "Bash the Old Folks" (a McCrory poem) (Letters to the Editor)

© 2013 Indy Week • 302 E. Pettigrew St., Suite 300, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation