Re: Gender and sexuality; Duke Energy rate hike | Letters to the Editor | Indy Week
Pin It

Re: Gender and sexuality; Duke Energy rate hike 


Re: Gender and sexuality

As always, Eva Hayward hits the nail on the head ("When love gets difficult," Feb. 27) when she takes issue with Chuck Klosterman's superficial and thereby dangerous understanding of gender and sexuality. Gay, straight, bisexual and transgender are not mutually exclusive identifiers. They come together in various combinations, and the resulting permutations are innumerable. I happen to be a gay man, and I happen to be so because I say so. I was born into a male body in which I still live, and I have been attracted to other men for as long as I can remember.

However, I learned at society's knee to deny that to myself and to everyone else. I married at 22 and divorced at 36 when the bottomless depression in which I lived became more suffocating than I could bear. My sadness was hardly "confined to [my]self," as Klosterman would have us believe. It was, in fact, destroying everything.

Was my wife's happiness a factor in whether I came out or not? Of course it was. I stayed in the marriage for 14 years for that very reason, knowing I would leave a trail of wreckage in my wake should I leave. But what is a relationship, really, when one partner is not living authentically, when one partner is hiding his very identity?

After several exceedingly difficult years, my ex-wife and I were able to find our way back to the friendship that initially brought us together. It took time—together and apart—as well as patience, understanding, love and, above all, truth. To suggest that I should have laid out the pros and cons of coming out on a 1980s version of an Excel spreadsheet, as if I were shopping for a car, is beneath anyone who has the audacity to call himself an ethicist.

Christopher Ross, South Boston, Va.


Re: Duke Energy rate hike

On March 13 [at the Dobbs Building, 430 N. Salisbury St., Raleigh], Duke Energy will hold a public meeting concerning their proposed rate hikes. If Duke sticks to its word, the increase of 9.7 percent will be used to finance further nuclear power operations. This is an issue that we all have a stake in, and if North Carolina residents are going to be paying more for their energy, then Duke should invest wisely.

The construction of a nuclear power plant is a costly endeavor and eventually leads to the even more costly issue of nuclear waste disposal. While nuclear plants do provide substantial energy output, their reliance on distant resources and the costly storage of radioactive material suggests there are better options. It's time for Duke to integrate more renewable technologies that can bring jobs to our state and power to our grids. While renewables currently contribute only a small amount to our grid, the only real barrier to their large-scale use is a lack of investment.

Erik Vosburgh, N.C. State, Raleigh


Latest in Letters to the Editor

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor



Twitter Activity

Most Recent Comments

Please, Mr. Keen, inform us on what kind of person Hilary Clinton is. But please leave out the innuendo, unsupported …

by GorSun on Smug Revisionism (Letters to the Editor)

Thank you cleverweist1 and Cristel Gutshchenritter Orrand for the opportunity to stand up for what I believe in as a …

by half full on A Massive Scar (Letters to the Editor)

Mr Pollock makes some good points .
Noam Chomsky and Ron Paul have similar views on wars we have waged …

by CHHS Tiger on History you won't like either (Letters to the Editor)

Sadly, this letter, while well-meaning, is deeply flawed. The background check gun control law has failed but it can never …

by ProudlyUnaffiliated on No new gun laws! (Letters to the Editor)

For the life of me, I do not understand why folks keep yelling about their 2nd Amendment rights as though …

by cityfox on No new gun laws! (Letters to the Editor)

Comments

Please, Mr. Keen, inform us on what kind of person Hilary Clinton is. But please leave out the innuendo, unsupported …

by GorSun on Smug Revisionism (Letters to the Editor)

Thank you cleverweist1 and Cristel Gutshchenritter Orrand for the opportunity to stand up for what I believe in as a …

by half full on A Massive Scar (Letters to the Editor)

Most Read

  1. Recounting Him Out (Peripheral Visions)
  2. Safe Spaces (Letters to the Editor)
  3. Smug Revisionism (Letters to the Editor)
  4. Dot-con (Peripheral Visions)

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation