Re: Erick Daniels' freedom; Hugh Webster's stand | Letters to the Editor | Indy Week
Pin It

Re: Erick Daniels' freedom; Hugh Webster's stand 

Erick Daniels is free; thanks to the Independent

I cried as I read "Finally free" in the Sept. 24 Independent, as I had done reading the earlier article on Erick Daniels as well ("Stolen youth," May 23, 2007). I thank God that he was finally released.

Thanks to Mosi Secret and the Independent for such excellent journalism.

Patty Ayers
Chapel Hill


Congressional candidates should fight global warming

Given that Hugh Webster has a farming background and "vociferous opposition to taxes" ("Hugh Webster's long-shot bid for Congress hinges on immigration," by Matt Saldaña, Oct. 1), it is a wonder that he has not responded to the University of Maryland's report on the "Costs of Climate Change" by pledging to support legislation that will limit global warming pollution.

Released in July, the researchers predicted billions in losses for the states studied, such as Kansas, where they predicted losses "exceeding $1 billion from impact on agriculture of predicted warmer temperatures and reduced water supply in much of the state." That same fate could ring true for agriculture in North Carolina. According to the research coordinator, Matthius Ruth, "Inaction or delayed action will make the ink run redder."

People here in North Carolina are trying to do something about this situation, including the more than 60 people who attended a rally for Clean Energy Solutions to Global Warming at the state Capitol on Oct. 5. We called on our candidates to take action.

Neither candidate for Congress, Webster or U.S. Rep. Brad Miller, has filled out Greenpeace's simple global warming questionnaire; how will voters know what their plan is to confront the most pressing issue of this generation if they don't tell us?

Kel Miller
Raleigh

Latest in Letters to the Editor

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor



Twitter Activity

Most Recent Comments

Thank you cleverweist1 and Cristel Gutshchenritter Orrand for the opportunity to stand up for what I believe in as a …

by half full on A Massive Scar (Letters to the Editor)

Mr Pollock makes some good points .
Noam Chomsky and Ron Paul have similar views on wars we have waged …

by CHHS Tiger on History you won't like either (Letters to the Editor)

Sadly, this letter, while well-meaning, is deeply flawed. The background check gun control law has failed but it can never …

by ProudlyUnaffiliated on No new gun laws! (Letters to the Editor)

For the life of me, I do not understand why folks keep yelling about their 2nd Amendment rights as though …

by cityfox on No new gun laws! (Letters to the Editor)

It seems the real problem with the guns is that the wrong people can get them illegally by : stealing …

by CHHS Tiger on No new gun laws! (Letters to the Editor)

Comments

Thank you cleverweist1 and Cristel Gutshchenritter Orrand for the opportunity to stand up for what I believe in as a …

by half full on A Massive Scar (Letters to the Editor)

Mr Pollock makes some good points .
Noam Chomsky and Ron Paul have similar views on wars we have waged …

by CHHS Tiger on History you won't like either (Letters to the Editor)

Most Read

  1. Smug Revisionism (Letters to the Editor)
  2. Dot-con (Peripheral Visions)

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation