Pin It
How will voters know what [the candidates'] plan is to confront the most pressing issue of this generation if they don't tell us?

Re: Erick Daniels' freedom; Hugh Webster's stand 

Erick Daniels is free; thanks to the Independent

I cried as I read "Finally free" in the Sept. 24 Independent, as I had done reading the earlier article on Erick Daniels as well ("Stolen youth," May 23, 2007). I thank God that he was finally released.

Thanks to Mosi Secret and the Independent for such excellent journalism.

Patty Ayers
Chapel Hill


Congressional candidates should fight global warming

Given that Hugh Webster has a farming background and "vociferous opposition to taxes" ("Hugh Webster's long-shot bid for Congress hinges on immigration," by Matt Saldaña, Oct. 1), it is a wonder that he has not responded to the University of Maryland's report on the "Costs of Climate Change" by pledging to support legislation that will limit global warming pollution.

Released in July, the researchers predicted billions in losses for the states studied, such as Kansas, where they predicted losses "exceeding $1 billion from impact on agriculture of predicted warmer temperatures and reduced water supply in much of the state." That same fate could ring true for agriculture in North Carolina. According to the research coordinator, Matthius Ruth, "Inaction or delayed action will make the ink run redder."

People here in North Carolina are trying to do something about this situation, including the more than 60 people who attended a rally for Clean Energy Solutions to Global Warming at the state Capitol on Oct. 5. We called on our candidates to take action.

Neither candidate for Congress, Webster or U.S. Rep. Brad Miller, has filled out Greenpeace's simple global warming questionnaire; how will voters know what their plan is to confront the most pressing issue of this generation if they don't tell us?

Kel Miller
Raleigh

Comments (0)

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor

  • Re: The Legislature; climate change

    "Thank you many times over for posting the week's N.C. legislative bills passed. Also for the statistics page. Both are very helpful in keeping abreast of the insanity of the radical Republicans in our state government."
    • May 22, 2013
  • Re: Climate change; clean energy

    "Duke, Exxon and the Koch Brothers may be turning up the heat, but they're also investing in political power and public relations (i.e. lies)."
    • May 8, 2013
  • Re: Climate change

    "I have found the climate movement here to be not only alive and well, but growing and gaining momentum."
    • May 1, 2013
  • More »

Facebook Activity

Twitter Activity

Read indyweek's Tweets

Comments

Following what I also agree was a rather one sided article, I am pleased to see comments in support of …

by Helen Needham on Re: Goathouse Refuge (Letters to the Editor)

The Democrats are cheating my kids out of a life of freedom and liberty!

by Sheila Barber on Re: Political reporting; fracking; "Bash the Old Folks" (a McCrory poem) (Letters to the Editor)

© 2013 Indy Week • 302 E. Pettigrew St., Suite 300, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation