Re: Durham's donut hole; Curbing tailpipe emissions | Letters to the Editor | Indy Week
Pin It

Re: Durham's donut hole; Curbing tailpipe emissions 

Close Durham's donut hole

Matt Saldaña's latest Indy article (on our Triangulator blog, Feb. 17; see this week's update) underscores the 25-square-mile "donut hole"—roughly 25 percent of the city—in which no water quality control standards exist. Yup, that's right, none at all. We should all thank council members Diane Catotti and Mike Woodard for continuing to fight the good fight.

Already this week (and that's in just three days) I've read about developers threatening to move elsewhere if they are forced to adhere to environmental protections under consideration (both in Wake and Durham counties). If the whole Triangle imposes such environmental protections—and I don't think any of us have a choice—then in order to make good on their threat, the development industry will have to move to a less lucrative and growing area than Durham, which we all know isn't going to happen, particularly in the current economy.

Our past lack of environmental protections is going to cost Durham hundreds of millions to clean up the pollution already spilling out of developments that have been permitted in the last 10 to 20 years. Too bad we can't charge the developers for this cleanup. The least we can do is ensure that what little land we have left is developed the way it all should have been from the get-go.

Melissa Rooney

More conversation online

Readers comment, complain and offer kudos on our Web site. Here's a sampling of comments this week; join the conversation.

Re: Curbing tailpipe emissions

[Quoting Bob Glaser, N.C. Automobile Dealers Association lobbyist]: "All of the big SUVs and big trucks won't qualify for this. The day of the F-250, the farm truck, the truck that pulls your boat [will be] over. You just won't be able to get them" ("Tailpipe emissions on the table," by Sam Wardle, Feb. 18). As Harry Truman would say, horse manure. The key word is "average" mileage. How many people own farms, or boats big enough to have to be pulled by a truck? Darn few. The domestic auto industry has got to wise up and stop trying to market huge guzzlers to the rest of us, or it's going the way of the woolly mammoth—killed off by smaller, more agile hunters. Sadly, it's almost there now. One ... last ... chance, friends.

Dan Besse

Latest in Letters to the Editor


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor

Twitter Activity


Thank you cleverweist1 and Cristel Gutshchenritter Orrand for the opportunity to stand up for what I believe in as a …

by half full on A Massive Scar (Letters to the Editor)

Mr Pollock makes some good points .
Noam Chomsky and Ron Paul have similar views on wars we have waged …

by CHHS Tiger on History you won't like either (Letters to the Editor)

Most Read

  1. The Myth of Gender (Back Talk)
  2. Hair Don't (Peripheral Visions)

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation