Re: Durham General Assembly; Rep. Price and PACs | Letters to the Editor | Indy Week
Pin It

Re: Durham General Assembly; Rep. Price and PACs 


Re: Durham, explain yourself

I would like Durham's delegation to the General Assembly to explain their votes to approve Senate Bill 138 last year. SB 138 criminalizes the possession or consumption of the plant Salvia divinorum, though growing it for aesthetic purposes remains legal, for now.

I can't vote for the reactionary Republican challengers, but I don't want to give support to so-called progressive Democrats who approved SB 138. They should explain why they felt the need to declare yet another plant an illegal "drug," when there is no evidence of a problem, and why the law is so mild if there is a problem, in their opinions. What constituency are they pandering to?

The General Assembly should stop discriminating against third parties so voters can have more choices, but that would be against the interests of the two-party monopoly.

Michael Pollock
Durham


Re: Price and PACs

Since taking office, Rep. David Price has taken $3.5 million from big-business PACs. This election cycle alone (as of last report), more than half of his campaign (54 percent) has been funded by PACs. This obviously means that less than half of his campaign is funded by individuals in the 4th Congressional District.

In what I consider to be the most egregious example of all, a sizeable chunk of his campaign is funded by several defense contractors. This is troubling because Rep. Price is the chairman of the Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security. With that being said, how can he justify saying that a "Republican takeover in Washington would be a return to special interests writing the rules for Wall Street, environmental policy and consumer protections" when clearly he is not a Republican, and clearly he is in the back pocket of special interests? And how can he complain about the "corrupting influence" of special interests and then sit back and take $3.5 million from PACs since becoming a "public servant"?

I am NOT a fan of the Democrats OR Republicans, but I'm most angry that a big-business corporatist like David Price can get away with it unnoticed for 22 years.

Brady Nemeth
Raleigh

Editor's Note: For information about campaign contributions to both David Price and challenger B.J. Lawson, see www.opensecrets.org/races/summary.php?cycle=2010&id=NC04.


Latest in Letters to the Editor

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor



Twitter Activity

Comments

Thank you cleverweist1 and Cristel Gutshchenritter Orrand for the opportunity to stand up for what I believe in as a …

by half full on A Massive Scar (Letters to the Editor)

Mr Pollock makes some good points .
Noam Chomsky and Ron Paul have similar views on wars we have waged …

by CHHS Tiger on History you won't like either (Letters to the Editor)

Most Read

  1. The Myth of Gender (Back Talk)
  2. Hair Don't (Peripheral Visions)

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation