Re: Defense of Marriage Act; A state of surveillance | Letters to the Editor | Indy Week
Pin It

Re: Defense of Marriage Act; A state of surveillance 


Re: A state of surveillance

It's noteworthy to include another substantive benefactor of the PATRIOT Act's vast scope of influence ("A state of surveillance," Sept. 14): the hundreds of local and state law enforcement agencies that have received federal money to fight "domestic terror." This includes combating such social evils as child pornography (however it is defined, and that varies from state to state), the Internet predation of children (however a child is defined, and that varies from state to state) and the purported war against human trafficking (a euphemism for corralling "illegal" immigrants).

These areas of increased government action, particularly at the local level, was largely financed by PATRIOT Act funds. State and local governments have been wildly successful at using these areas of increased police power to lull voters into knee-jerk affirmations about the need to combat social "evils" that are generally unsupported by statistical data or serious academic study.

Countless lives have been destroyed in the process, and, saddest of all, the media will rarely investigate the scourge for fear of public outrage. There is a story here, if anyone has the courage to report it.

Robin W. Vanderwall
Raleigh


Re: Defense of Marriage Act

The people who are decimating education and human services—who have given us the right to carry concealed handguns into parks and bars—have taken aim against same-sex marriage ("General Assembly underhandedly passes DOMA," Sept. 14).

What heartens me is the anger this decision has generated among straight allies. Twice since the bill passed, two colleagues have come to me to express rage and ask what they can do.

The answer is simple: Channel outrage, sway people opposed to civil rights and vote for fairness. If anger motivates action, this is the time to stoke the fire.

For the LGBT community, the silver lining is twofold. Today's young people support gay equality; they are tomorrow's leaders. On civil rights, the U.S. Constitution trumps state law. If people speak out, the U.S. Supreme Court will ultimately override anti-gay marriage legislation like it erased homo- and heterosexual anti-sodomy laws in 2003.

The situation is more bleak for the uninsured, for students and teachers whose dreams are evaporating and more than 2 million North Carolinians without enough food to eat. Their hope rests in our anger too.

Keith Hayes
Carrboro

  • "Channel outrage, sway people opposed to civil rights and vote for fairness." — Keith Hayes

Latest in Letters to the Editor

Comments

Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor



Twitter Activity

Comments

Thank you cleverweist1 and Cristel Gutshchenritter Orrand for the opportunity to stand up for what I believe in as a …

by half full on A Massive Scar (Letters to the Editor)

Mr Pollock makes some good points .
Noam Chomsky and Ron Paul have similar views on wars we have waged …

by CHHS Tiger on History you won't like either (Letters to the Editor)

Most Read

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation