Re: "Creation Nation" | Letters to the Editor | Indy Week
Pin It

Re: "Creation Nation" 

Two kinds of people read your Feb. 22 article "Creation Nation": those who believe in creationism, eager to further support their beliefs, and those opposed to it, looking to reinforce their beliefs by finding flaws in the article.

A portion of Jason Lisle's quote struck me as profound. He said that man "makes mistakes, has limited knowledge, can often misinterpret the evidence, is sometimes dishonest." His quote was supporting creationism, but my point is, he is also a man. Could he be making a mistake and misinterpreting evidence?

As adults, we prematurely "decide" what we believe. We adopt beliefs from our upbringing, alter them a bit so they feel like our own, then spend the rest of our lives collecting two mounds of data: one that reinforces what we believe and one that discredits opposing views.

When we "know" what we believe, we are not interested in the validity of the other side. We won't admit that the other side may know something that we don't. We dig our heels in and defend our truth, instead of critically shining the opposing light onto our own beliefs.

What is so frightening about examining the other viewpoint; one just as heavy with evidence, disproof and agenda as our own? Would it take too much energy to sift through the loaded data and skewed "facts"? Would it be so traumatic to learn we had been "wrong"?

Ken Ham feels that understanding creationism is the key to ending racism. I have a better idea. What if we started learning about beliefs opposing our own? Not with a critical eye, looking to discredit and find holes, but with an acceptance that "truths" we've held for years may not hold up in the light of the opposing view.

Susan Hurley

Durham

Latest in Letters to the Editor

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor



Twitter Activity

Most Recent Comments

Thank you cleverweist1 and Cristel Gutshchenritter Orrand for the opportunity to stand up for what I believe in as a …

by half full on A Massive Scar (Letters to the Editor)

Mr Pollock makes some good points .
Noam Chomsky and Ron Paul have similar views on wars we have waged …

by CHHS Tiger on History you won't like either (Letters to the Editor)

Sadly, this letter, while well-meaning, is deeply flawed. The background check gun control law has failed but it can never …

by ProudlyUnaffiliated on No new gun laws! (Letters to the Editor)

For the life of me, I do not understand why folks keep yelling about their 2nd Amendment rights as though …

by cityfox on No new gun laws! (Letters to the Editor)

It seems the real problem with the guns is that the wrong people can get them illegally by : stealing …

by CHHS Tiger on No new gun laws! (Letters to the Editor)

Comments

Thank you cleverweist1 and Cristel Gutshchenritter Orrand for the opportunity to stand up for what I believe in as a …

by half full on A Massive Scar (Letters to the Editor)

Mr Pollock makes some good points .
Noam Chomsky and Ron Paul have similar views on wars we have waged …

by CHHS Tiger on History you won't like either (Letters to the Editor)

Most Read

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation