Raleigh Parks and Recreational Facilities Bond | Our Endorsements | Indy Week
Pin It

Raleigh Parks and Recreational Facilities Bond 

If you don’t love parks, then you should check to see if you have a pulse.

Raleigh voters can decide whether to approve a $91.7 million bond to upgrade and create new parks, greenways and cultural facilities.

If approved by voters, the bond would add a 1.72-cent increase in the city’s property tax rate, effective July 1, 2015. What does that mean for you? If you own a $150,000 home, you’d pay about $25 more a year. If you own a $300,000 a home would add another $51 to your tax bill. Come on, you’ve probably found $25 in an old winter coat.

There are 23 projects that would be phased in over the next 5–7 years, beginning in the fall of 2015. These include $12.5 million for Chavis Memorial Park, $3 million to bring Laurel Hills playground up to Americans With Disabilities Act standards. Several city cemeteries would get an upgrade, and several greenways would be expanded, including the Crabtree Creek Connection to Umstead ($4.4 million).

An additional $2 million would help build a new park, Devereux Meadows at the corner of Peace Street and Capital Boulevard.

Take a forest bath and vote yes on Raleigh’s park and recreational facilities bond.

  • $91 million bond would help pay for 23 new projects, while adding just 1.72 percent to the property tax rate

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Our Endorsements



Twitter Activity

Most Recent Comments

Hello,
It is sad to realize that Hilary Clinton who is the initiator of ISIS creation starting from Arab springs …

by amias on Your Participation is Mandatory: The INDY’s 2016 Primary Endorsements (Our Endorsements)

That's democracy? My bad. I thought we were a republic. That's what I pledged to my flag. Hillary is paid …

by bpch on Your Participation is Mandatory: The INDY’s 2016 Primary Endorsements (Our Endorsements)

We all know that it's a done deal that HRC will be the democratic candidate, all the more reason to …

by 0cdt on Your Participation is Mandatory: The INDY’s 2016 Primary Endorsements (Our Endorsements)

@Anderson Orr: I find your lukewarm reasoning rather upsetting considering the danger that HRC will not be chosen by many …

by Noah on Your Participation is Mandatory: The INDY’s 2016 Primary Endorsements (Our Endorsements)

Dear Indy,

The divide among your editorial board sounds like a mirror image of my own conflicted inner debate. …

by Anderson D. Orr on Your Participation is Mandatory: The INDY’s 2016 Primary Endorsements (Our Endorsements)

Comments

Hello,
It is sad to realize that Hilary Clinton who is the initiator of ISIS creation starting from Arab springs …

by amias on Your Participation is Mandatory: The INDY’s 2016 Primary Endorsements (Our Endorsements)

That's democracy? My bad. I thought we were a republic. That's what I pledged to my flag. Hillary is paid …

by bpch on Your Participation is Mandatory: The INDY’s 2016 Primary Endorsements (Our Endorsements)

Most Read

No recently-read stories.

Visit the archives…

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation