Property owners sue Durham over Jordan Lake | Durham County | Indy Week
Pin It

Property owners sue Durham over Jordan Lake 

More than 50 property owners near Jordan Lake have been tied up in a three-month dispute with Durham County over a petition they filed this fall, in hopes of keeping a protective area around Jordan Lake intact. Their crusade to protect the land—just north of the Durham County line, west of N.C. 751, near Chancellor's Ridge—from development is going to court.

Attorney Jim Conner of the Ragsdale Liggett firm in Raleigh filed a lawsuit against Durham County late Friday on behalf of four property owners who had signed a petition: Kristen Corbell, Jeffrey and Milagros Napoli and the Kendrick Estates Investment Corporation.

The lawsuit argues that although City-County Planning Director Steve Medlin initially questioned the validity of the petition, he eventually ruled it was valid. A valid petition would have required a 4-to-1 vote from the County Commissioners for the rezoning to pass. And since the commissioners voted only 3-to-2 in favor of the rezoning, Conner asserts, the motion failed and the county cannot rezone the land.

"The courts have already said in other cases that if there's a valid petition and there's a vote that's not a three-quarters vote, then the rezoning doesn't pass," Conner said.

The county has 30 days to file an answer to the lawsuit. A Durham County attorney did not respond on the issue by press time.

The protest petition is part of a much larger fight by many property owners near the lake against a proposed development they say would further pollute the already tainted reservoir. Southern Durham Development is shaping plans to develop a mixed-use community that would include 1,300 residences and 600,000 square feet of combined office and retail space.

Before the protected boundary around Jordan Lake was rezoned in October, Southern Durham Development would not have been able to build its project because much of the land it has acquired is protected from dense development. But when commissioners moved the protected area—based on controversial data on where the lake and its boundaries exist—this shifted protections off the land Southern Durham Development owns. Now it's up to a Durham superior court judge to rule whether that rezoning vote stands, which further delays the developer's plans.

Conner said it could be February before the complaint will be assigned a court date.


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Durham County

Twitter Activity



I'll look over your link, but for now I believe that it looks like tax breaks, a community …

by Eric Tullis on What Will It Take for Durham to Clean Up the Area around N.C. Central? (Durham County)

@Eric Tullis - I think that's a great idea, I wonder what that incentive could look like. Right now the …

by Gladdek on What Will It Take for Durham to Clean Up the Area around N.C. Central? (Durham County)

Most Read

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation