Parents and environmental activists concerned about sewage sludge fields near schools | North Carolina | Indy Week
Pin It

Parents and environmental activists concerned about sewage sludge fields near schools 

Click for larger image • North Carolina’s permitted sewage sludge application fields

Map courtesy of N.C. DENR

Click for larger image • North Carolina’s permitted sewage sludge application fields

The first thing you notice is the stench. "It's not going to smell like your husband's farts," says Myra Dotson. "It smells like fetid, festering meat."

A former UNC research assistant and current environmental activist, Dotson has lived near a sewage sludge field on Orange Grove Road in western Orange County for 20 years.

Officially known as biosolids, sludge is a byproduct of the wastewater treatment process used as agricultural fertilizer across North Carolina and the country for three decades.

Scientific studies differ on their assessment of the health and environmental impacts of the sludge. But Dotson has chosen a side. "I'm sick of it," she says. "Literally."

Dotson and her fellow environmental activists, known as the Sewage Sludge Action Network, say exposure to biosolids causes headaches, nausea, respiratory problems, lesions and more.

They are taking their case to Alamance County parents, pointing out three schools—Sylvan Elementary in Snow Camp, Pleasant Grove Elementary in Burlington and B. Everett Jordan Elementary in the Saxapahaw area—sit within a half-mile of biosolid operations.

Some Alamance County schoolkids have become ill from sludge sprayed on nearby fields, parents and teachers said at a Burlington City Council meeting this month. Representatives for Alamance-Burlington Schools could not be reached for comment by press time Tuesday.

The clamor prompted Burlington leaders this month to halt biosolid application during school hours as city staff review the practice. Burlington counts roughly 4,000 acres permitted for application within municipal limits.

"They should be looking at a better way to dispose of it," says Sue Dayton, a Saxapahaw antique seller and, like Dotson, an environmental activist. "And they should tell the truth."

The truth about sludge, it seems, depends on whom you ask.

A survey published in March by UNC-Chapel Hill epidemiologists echoed Dayton's and Dotson's worries. More than half of the 34 sludge field neighbors interviewed in North Carolina, South Carolina and Virginia blamed the farming operations for health ailments—difficulty breathing, skin infections or sores, nausea and migraines.

The survey called for greater regulation and research, citing studies that indicate sludge treatment and applications are based on "outdated science and may be insufficient to protect public health and the environment."

Authors reported lax enforcement of biosolid regulations that depend on self-reporting, including accounts of sludge spills, runoff into waterways and cattle grazing on just-sprayed lands, despite regulations mandating a 30-day waiting period for grazing. University researchers also noted social justice issues because the majority of sludge applications are found in rural areas.

State maps confirm that finding. Permitted fields stretch across North Carolina—including Orange and Wake counties—but are heavily clustered in rural areas.

"Urban people are having the advantage of a cheap way to get rid of their waste," says report co-author Steve Wing. "But it's at the expense of the rural people."

But most environmental regulators and waste managers say biosolid use is safe. The N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) cite biosolid application as a "beneficial" reuse of waste. Without the land application, sludge byproduct would pile up at regional wastewater treatment plants, they say.

Additionally, proponents note scientific research, including the UNC survey, has failed to find a cause and effect relationship between biosolid application and reported negative impacts on health and the environment .

"One of the biggest problems for this product is misinformation," says Eric Davis, water and sewer operations manager for the City of Burlington.

Bob Rubin, N.C. State professor emeritus in biological and agricultural engineering, says he has researched and advocated for biosolid reuse for 40 years. Rubin says he would not advocate if he did not believe it to be safe.

"The detractors of our practices point to the unknowns and say, 'Well, you don't' know everything,'" Rubin says. "Well, you don't know what's in the food you eat, but you still eat it."

Nevertheless, UNC report co-authors Wing and Amy Lowman say the survey's results should not be ignored.

"Look at lead-based gasoline; look at asbestos," Wing says. "They were done for decades before people realized it was killing us or making us sick."

Local governments contract with companies to spread the treated waste byproduct in and outside of their borders. In most cases, the sludge is offered free to local farmers. Biosolids are broken down into Class A and Class B designations, with the former a higher-treatment option eliminating 99 percent of pathogens and bacteria.

The latter, according to DENR, is a less stringent—and more common—treatment alternative that reduces pathogen levels by 90 percent, meeting federal and state limits.

A 2010 DENR report estimated approximately 5,000 fields, or about 107,000 acres statewide, were permitted for Class B dispersal as of September 2009. Approximately 88,500 dry tons of the sludge was spread in North Carolina in 2008, the report says.

Former state lawmaker Joe Hackney, a powerful Democrat and longtime cattle farmer in Chatham County, says he has used biosolids for 20 years, but regularly tests soil samples and wells for contamination. "We have not perceived any problems from it," Hackney says.

John Kiviniemi, biosolids manager of Orange Water and Sewer Authority (OWASA), says his agency includes 1,000 acres in Orange, Chatham and Alamance in its biosolid recycling program, spreading about 700 dry tons a year over farmlands. He notes, however, that OWASA only spreads Class A sludge.

Local governments, as Orange Board of Commissioners Chairman Barry Jacobs points out, are mostly powerless to limit its dispersal. However, county leaders lobby for that power each year with state lawmakers.

"There's definitely something to be said for having an inexpensive, if not free, fertilizer source for farmers who are working with small margins of profit," Jacobs says. "But we're not even at the place where [local leaders] are at the table."

DENR and EPA regulate the operations, ordering setback requirements from dwellings, waterways and drinking wells. However, as critics note, no specific setbacks exist to offer enhanced buffering for schools.

But Kiviniemi says decades of scientific study indicate the practice is safe. "It is just as safe for the environment as if people were putting out commercial fertilizer," he says.

That may be, Jacobs says, but when there is scientific discord, leaders should show caution.

"It's a little bit like the thought that cell phones cause damage to your brain or living under power lines is bad for your health," Jacobs says. "There's evidence that at least makes one cautious. Until you know better, it's better to be cautious than to just act like there's no problem."

Correction: Permitted sludge fields exist in Orange and Wake (not Durham) counties.

This article appeared in print with the headline "Sludge happens."

Comments (13)

Showing 1-13 of 13

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-13 of 13

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in North Carolina



Twitter Activity

Most Recent Comments

Pay to play is alive and well in NC...only time voters matter is at election...Then the lies begin.

by Tony Dockery on What’s Standing Between Rural North Carolina and Reliable Internet Service? (North Carolina)

Jackson is just another republican creep who likes his slave labor...I am not surprised by this....This is how they govern......The …

by Tony Dockery on The U.S. Department of Labor Hits a State Senator’s Farm with a Conspicuously Small Fine (North Carolina)

Who are Jackson Farming Company's customers? Seems like this is the only place to apply pressure.

by Donald Chartier on The U.S. Department of Labor Hits a State Senator’s Farm with a Conspicuously Small Fine (North Carolina)

I know how many feel. I live between Benson and Highway 210. The only internet available, except satellite, is CenturyLink. …

by Kitty Hegemann 1 on What’s Standing Between Rural North Carolina and Reliable Internet Service? (North Carolina)

Missed Dr. LUEBKE today at UNC. I know he would have introduced the President of the United States as they …

by bethlalonde@yahoo.com on RIP Paul Luebke, a Progressive Icon (North Carolina)

Comments

Pay to play is alive and well in NC...only time voters matter is at election...Then the lies begin.

by Tony Dockery on What’s Standing Between Rural North Carolina and Reliable Internet Service? (North Carolina)

Jackson is just another republican creep who likes his slave labor...I am not surprised by this....This is how they govern......The …

by Tony Dockery on The U.S. Department of Labor Hits a State Senator’s Farm with a Conspicuously Small Fine (North Carolina)

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation