Orange still studying ban on dog tethering | Orange County | Indy Week
Pin It

Orange still studying ban on dog tethering 

click to enlarge followup.jpg

Orange County Commissioners raised more questions about the implementation of a proposed ban on dog tethering Monday night, at a work session in which they examined the plan for the first time since delaying a vote in June.

Commissioner Mike Nelson, the board's liaison to the committee tasked with researching the issue, said that while the tethering committee initially favored an outright ban, it compromised due to pushback, mostly from hunters and other rural residents, some of whom were in attendance Monday night.

"The real issue here is not tethering, it's more about the type of dog involved in these cruelty complaints," says Philip Pennell. "Hunting dogs aren't aggressive like that."

Pennell sat in the gallery with other members of the Eno River Coon Hunters Club as commissioners pressed Bob Marotto, Orange County animal services director, for data on the number of instances where tethering resulted in the department filing an animal cruelty or neglect citation.

"I hear what the professionals are saying, but I would like to see what they're seeing," said board Chairman Barry Jacobs. "I want it substantiated."

Proponents of the law, however, say it will not only protect dogs, but people as well—especially children.

"Tethering doesn't protect dogs, hunting dogs or otherwise, from people or animals that mean them harm," says Amanda Arrington, head of the Coalition to Unchain Dogs, which has lobbied for the change in both Durham and Orange counties, as well as donated fences and construction labor to local families who want to move their dogs off chains. "Neither does it protect people from what might be an aggressive dog."

Commissioners decided to forgo hearing public comment, having heard hours of testimony at two previous meetings.

If passed, the ordinance would allow dogs to be tethered for no longer than three hours in a 24-hour period, except for during agricultural or sporting events. The ban would also prohibit certain restraint devices such as choke chains.

Similar to Durham's recently approved tethering ban, Orange County's plan includes a six-month grace period during which citations issued by animal control would result in a warning instead of the $200 fine.

Animal Services staff were asked to come back to the board with hard numbers on the number and type of cruelty complaints filed. The board did not set a date for a vote.

Read more:


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Orange County

Twitter Activity


moved from NYC to chapel hill in 2014 after it was suggested to me that it was a good place …

by Ha Steffany on After 15 years, Chapel Hill is still trying to get a grip on its housing problem (Orange County)

""Unfortunately, trails have become soft spots for crime," Silva told the OSAWA board. "They're considered 'blueberry patches' now—easy places to …

by Sean D Sorrentino on Not Everyone Wants the Mountains-to-Sea Trail in Their Backyard (Orange County)

Most Read

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation