Marriage equality in North Carolina and beyond | News Feature | Indy Week
Pin It

Marriage equality in North Carolina and beyond 

The law of the lands

It's been an eventful year for the marriage equality movement.

The Barack Obama administration, which has been largely silent on GLBT issues since the election, recently raised the ire of marriage equality advocates when the Justice Department issued a brief defending the Defense of Marriage Act, despite the fact that candidate Obama spoke out against it.

Signed into law in 1996 by President Bill Clinton, the DOMA defines marriage as a legal union exclusively between one man and one woman and says no state must recognize a relationship between persons of the same sex as a marriage, even if it is considered a marriage in another state.

President Obama later extended some benefits to the same-sex partners of federal employees, but outrage over the DOMA brief has fueled a campaign among GLBT advocates to withhold fund-raising dollars for the Democratic Party until the party and the president take a stronger stand in support of gay rights.

Meanwhile, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Iowa, Vermont, Maine and New Hampshire have passed laws establishing marriage equality, going further than the civil unions and domestic partnerships available to residents of New Jersey, Oregon, Washington and the District of Columbia. Yet those advances were upstaged by the back-and-forth in California, where Proposition 8—a voter referendum that changed the state constitution to recognize only marriages between a man and a woman—was later upheld in part by the state supreme court.

Here in North Carolina, however, advocates of marriage equality have been on the defensive once again this year.

North Carolina law explicitly states, "Marriages, whether created by common law, contracted, or performed outside of North Carolina, between individuals of the same gender are not valid in North Carolina."

As they have in previous sessions, conservative state lawmakers this year proposed legislation (House Bill 361/ Senate Bill 272) that would also prohibit any recognition of civil unions, domestic partnerships or similar relationships in the state. The language is so broad, it could even prevent private companies from extending domestic partner benefits to their employees, Equality North Carolina Executive Director Ian Palmquist says. Though the bills didn't make it out of committee, they forced equality advocates to play defense in the legislature.

A March poll by Elon University showed more than half of North Carolinians polled opposed the amendment, while 43 percent supported it.

The 2010 Census will count same-sex couples for the first time, which could be a step toward federal recognition.

Comments

Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in News Feature



Twitter Activity

Most Recent Comments

Whatever happened to "Love thy neighbor?" As mother of the bride, we have spent a lot of time and money …

by motherofthebride on The Party Barn: Are Rustic Weddings Destroying a Way of Life in Rural Orange County? (News Feature)

SJW, don't you know we "need" density? We "need" to be forced out of our cars and into a CAT …

by Blainej on Born in the Shadow of N.C. State, Steeped in Parties and Punk Rock, Raleigh’s Historic Maiden Lane Will Soon Perish in the Name of Progress (News Feature)

Proud former resident of #8, 1978-80. We had a few memorable parties there back in the day. Loved the location …

by DWC on Born in the Shadow of N.C. State, Steeped in Parties and Punk Rock, Raleigh’s Historic Maiden Lane Will Soon Perish in the Name of Progress (News Feature)

SJW, don't you know we "need" density? We need to be forced out of our cars and into a CAT …

by Blainej on Born in the Shadow of N.C. State, Steeped in Parties and Punk Rock, Raleigh’s Historic Maiden Lane Will Soon Perish in the Name of Progress (News Feature)

I hate this. Raleigh's charm is being chewed up and spit out with ordinary and expensive. I can hardly afford …

by SJW on Born in the Shadow of N.C. State, Steeped in Parties and Punk Rock, Raleigh’s Historic Maiden Lane Will Soon Perish in the Name of Progress (News Feature)

Comments

Whatever happened to "Love thy neighbor?" As mother of the bride, we have spent a lot of time and money …

by motherofthebride on The Party Barn: Are Rustic Weddings Destroying a Way of Life in Rural Orange County? (News Feature)

SJW, don't you know we "need" density? We "need" to be forced out of our cars and into a CAT …

by Blainej on Born in the Shadow of N.C. State, Steeped in Parties and Punk Rock, Raleigh’s Historic Maiden Lane Will Soon Perish in the Name of Progress (News Feature)

Most Read

No recently-read stories.

Visit the archives…

© 2017 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation