Low hopes | Editorial | Indy Week
Pin It

Low hopes 

Chris Fitzsimon at N.C. Policy Watch was up Monday night analyzing the back-room budget bill worked out by legislative leaders. Here's his initial report:

It will take several days to decipher much of the $17.2-billion, 364-page budget bill that state lawmakers are expected to vote on this week. Like most budgets, the spending itself is a mixed bag: worthwhile programs funded alongside questionable expenditures, small amounts of money for some programs that need millions, no real funding for services that literally mean life or death.

The budget moves health care coverage of uninsured children under 5 from Health Choice to Medicaid, a welcome change that makes the coverage less subject to budget shortfalls and legislative funding decisions. But the move comes at a price, capping enrollment in Health Choice for kids from 6 to 18. That coverage ought to be guaranteed, too.

The budget expands Gov. Mike Easley's More at Four program for at-risk kids; spends more money on community mental health programs; funds enrollment increases in public schools, community colleges and universities; and establishes a wage floor for the lowest paid state employees.

But this is a budget that maintains the status quo in most areas, even in the areas in which the state is struggling. It is not a budget that will transform North Carolina. The budget also continues to virtually ignore the state's affordable housing crisis, spending only $5 million on the Housing Trust Fund that needs 10 times that much, and denies lifesaving medication to people living with HIV/AIDS.

It doesn't cut taxes on corporations or the wealthy, though those efforts may not be finished this session, but it leaves the regressive sales tax increase in place and sets the stage for the predatory lottery to raise revenue from the poor.

The budget does not include the Senate proposal to reduce Medicaid services to the aged, blind and disabled, though Senate leaders vow to continue pursuing it. State Sen. Kay Hagan told reporters, "If we are going to continue educating our children, we are going to have to reduce these services."

That is not true, of course. The state can educate our children and take care of folks who need help, but that would require a commitment and the political courage to raise enough revenue to begin to solve North Carolina's problems, not simply patch a few here and there, like this budget does.

For Fitzsimon's continued analysis on the budget, visit www.ncpolicywatch.org.


Oops: Last week we got our zeroes confused and said 13,000 people voted in the Indy's Best of the Triangle balloting this year. It was 1,300.

More by Chris Fitzsimon


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Editorial

Twitter Activity


Fresh ideas are essential to progressive journalism - Bravo to the new team - it feels like the old Indy …

by Bonnie Hauser on A Brief Note on the Indy's Recent Personnel Changes (Editorial)

Good luck to Skillet and Grayson! I've enjoyed their work for years and will miss them in these pages. …

by john i on A Brief Note on the Indy's Recent Personnel Changes (Editorial)

Most Read

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation