Letters to the Editor | Letters to the Editor | Indy Week
Pin It

Letters to the Editor 

Protect public from bad lawyers

Jeff Stern's exposé of the implosion of John McCormick's legal career ("In pursuit of John McCormick," cover story, May 16) is a story that needed to be told. Many local attorneys, myself included, had a hunch that all was not well with McCormick's law practice long before he disappeared.

We attorneys do indeed have a tendency to protect each other, as it is often only our colleagues who understand the pressure of performing day after day in an adversarial environment to the satisfaction of our clients, our judges, our colleagues, and, ultimately, the N.C. State Bar. It is easy to become cynical in such a stressful environment, and cynicism inevitably opens the door to the type of unethical behavior McCormick engaged in.

Since last year, I have been urging our local Bar to form a "professionalism support initiative (PSI)" within Judicial District 15-B, which encompasses Orange and Chatham counties. A PSI is a voluntary assistance program handling client-lawyer, lawyer-lawyer, and lawyer-judge issues. Volunteer attorneys and judges are trained to intervene and offer assistance to their peers in a non-confrontational manner after a report has been made regarding the attorney's or judge's unprofessional behavior. As unprofessional behavior often precedes unethical behavior, a local PSI can be the first line of defense in protecting the public from a wayward attorney.

I am pleased that our local Bar recently voted to implement a PSI for the purpose of promoting professionalism and bolstering public confidence in the legal profession. My hope is that it will provide the public and our local attorneys and judges with an avenue for reporting and addressing unprofessional behavior long before it reaches the level of McCormick's conduct. First and foremost, attorneys and judges are public servants and we should be working together to ensure that the citizens of Orange and Chatham counties are not harmed by one of our own.

Betsy J. Wolfenden
Chapel Hill

Raleigh leads on conservation

Your May 16 article ("Bad news for the Neuse," by Lisa Sorg) rightly points out the continued degradation of the Neuse River and Falls Lake, Raleigh's drinking water supply. A critical element in protecting the Neuse and other North Carolina rivers and streams is indeed land conservation. Undeveloped land along streams filters polluted runoff, is more cost-effective than technological fixes, reduces flooding downstream, and preserves land for recreation, wildlife habitat and scenic beauty.

In addition to your mention of Wake County aiming to preserve 30 percent of the county's land, the City of Raleigh has also recognized that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. The city helped to create the Upper Neuse Clean Water Initiative in 2005. The initiative builds on the great land conservation work private and public partners in the basin have been involved with for years. The partners developed a comprehensive regional plan to protect nine drinking water supplies in the six counties in the Upper Neuse basin, and have already protected more than 10 miles of streams, with another 17 miles in the pipeline.

For Raleigh's outstanding vision and leadership, including committing $1.5 million over three years for land protection efforts, the city was recently awarded the "Local Government Conservation Partner of the Year" award by North Carolina's 24 local land trusts.

D. Reid Wilson, Executive Director
Conservation Trust for North Carolina

Help children of inmate moms

The statistics about female inmates and their children are staggering. Therefore, it was with great interest that I read Debbie and Dave Biesack's findings in Patrick O'Neill's column (Religious Left, May 9).

It is in indeed tragic, as the Biesacks point out, that there is no facility in North Carolina for pregnant inmates nor any in-prison accommodations for newborns, infants or young children. Our Children's Place (OCP) is changing that reality. In partnership with the Department of Correction and through the efforts of community members—teachers, lawyers, health care providers, faith leaders and others—OCP will help maintain the vital bonds between mothers and their children.

OCP is a residential initiative allowing young children to live with their mothers while the women serve out their sentences for nonviolent offenses. OCP will focus on treating 20 nonviolent inmate mothers and up to 40 preschool children. It is designed to break the intergenerational cycle of crime, poverty, substance abuse and family violence. If renovation money is appropriated this year, OCP plans to open its doors by 2009. The women and children will live in a special, monitored facility modeled after programs in several other states.

OCP offers children of incarcerated mothers the opportunity to bond with their mothers and build a foundation for the future. As a secondary benefit to the children, the program offers inmate mothers the opportunity to change the self-destructive attitudes and negative personal choices that shape criminal activities. In this way we can lower recidivism among this inmate population.

Making OCP a reality will take a community effort. To learn more, please call us at 843-2670. We welcome your interest and support.

Mary U. Andrews, Chair
Our Children's Place Board of Directors

Latest in Letters to the Editor


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor

Twitter Activity


If the headline had been: "Is Scott Crawford Better Off Without Standard Food"? The answer would have been a resounding …

by Sue Mixson on Plate Expectations (Letters to the Editor)

Emma Laperruque and your response to this situation have been very unprofessional. Seeing the way both your organization and she …

by TayWoo on Plate Expectations (Letters to the Editor)

Most Read

  1. Unchased Thoughts. (Peripheral Visions)
  2. Won't Someone Please Think of the Drug Dealers? (Letters to the Editor)

Most Recent Comments

If the headline had been: "Is Scott Crawford Better Off Without Standard Food"? The answer would have been a resounding …

by Sue Mixson on Plate Expectations (Letters to the Editor)

Emma Laperruque and your response to this situation have been very unprofessional. Seeing the way both your organization and she …

by TayWoo on Plate Expectations (Letters to the Editor)

Please, Mr. Keen, inform us on what kind of person Hilary Clinton is. But please leave out the innuendo, unsupported …

by GorSun on Smug Revisionism (Letters to the Editor)

Thank you cleverweist1 and Cristel Gutshchenritter Orrand for the opportunity to stand up for what I believe in as a …

by half full on A Massive Scar (Letters to the Editor)

Mr Pollock makes some good points .
Noam Chomsky and Ron Paul have similar views on wars we have waged …

by CHHS Tiger on History you won't like either (Letters to the Editor)

© 2017 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation