Pin It
Once these places are lost to "the circling SUVs" and to the fantasy that big is better, no magic will bring them back. —John Luke

Letters to the Editor 

Preserving bungalows

As we state on the cover of each quarterly issue, American Bungalow is "published in the interest of preserving and restoring the modest American home, the bungalow, and the rich lifestyle it affords." I use Google alerts to automatically gather news and blog entries on "craftsman bungalows" each day. And almost every day brings a link to an article like this ("New growth ousts old charm," May 9), recounting the puzzlement, frustration, anguish and anger of residents of towns and cities across the nation whose bungalow neighborhoods and communities are being wrecked by inappropriate and unprincipled infill development.

This occurs even when, as with Roanoke Park, the community's residents have agreed to have the community listed on the National Register of Historic Places or voluntarily adopted other measures designed to encourage preservation and restoration of the community's historic homes.

In almost every case, local politicians who claim there is "no political will to act" find ways to derail their constituents' clearly expressed desire that they act to support responsible conservation and preservation of their community's architectural heritage and historic resources.

We are sharing more and more of these stories with our readers and lending moral support to local residents around the country when and where we can, because once these places are lost to "the circling SUVs" and to the fantasy that big is better, no magic will bring them back.

John Luke, Editor
American Bungalow
Sierra Madre, Calif.

Comments (0)

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor

  • Re: The Legislature; climate change

    "Thank you many times over for posting the week's N.C. legislative bills passed. Also for the statistics page. Both are very helpful in keeping abreast of the insanity of the radical Republicans in our state government."
    • May 22, 2013
  • Re: Climate change; clean energy

    "Duke, Exxon and the Koch Brothers may be turning up the heat, but they're also investing in political power and public relations (i.e. lies)."
    • May 8, 2013
  • Re: Climate change

    "I have found the climate movement here to be not only alive and well, but growing and gaining momentum."
    • May 1, 2013
  • More »

Facebook Activity

Twitter Activity

Read indyweek's Tweets

Comments

Following what I also agree was a rather one sided article, I am pleased to see comments in support of …

by Helen Needham on Re: Goathouse Refuge (Letters to the Editor)

The Democrats are cheating my kids out of a life of freedom and liberty!

by Sheila Barber on Re: Political reporting; fracking; "Bash the Old Folks" (a McCrory poem) (Letters to the Editor)

© 2013 Indy Week • 302 E. Pettigrew St., Suite 300, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation