Letters to the Editor: Divorce laws penalize women; Durham: Focus less on cars | Letters to the Editor | Indy Week
Pin It

Letters to the Editor: Divorce laws penalize women; Durham: Focus less on cars 

Divorce laws penalize women

As your "10 Smart Bills" article noted, there have been quite a few bills introduced this past session that would have created beneficial policy solutions to some of the problems currently facing many North Carolinians. Many of the bills listed in the article would have a positive impact on women and families in NC, increasing opportunities for greater economic self-sufficiency and better access to quality health care. We would also include HB867 on that list, which would have eliminated for domestic violence victims NC's already questionable requirement that couples be separated for one year prior to obtaining a divorce. Requiring abuse victims to stay legally tied to their abusers for an arbitrary period of time is not the way to support victims, and exposes them to further abuse, This bill seems like it should have had an easy and bipartisan pass through our legislature, yet it went nowhere.

We're again hearing talk this session from our legislators about women's rights and safety, and the protection of families. Much of this talk is coming from lawmakers who ram through bills to restrict abortion access, prevent families from accessing health care, and restrict our marriage choices; while a number of truly beneficial bills have been left to die in committee. Who are these legislators really protecting? Not the majority of North Carolinians.

Tara Romano, President, NC Women United


Durham: Focus less on cars

Hats off to the organizers of the recent Jane's Walk in downtown Durham ("Don't let it be Anywhere, U.S.A.", May 13). It is fitting to honor Jane Jacobs, who as a private citizen did so much to further the health and walkability of cities. And Curt Eshelman and Allen Wilcox (and many others) deserve our unending praise for creating Durham Central Park.

If Jacobs were alive today and visited Durham, what would she tell us? As the article mentions, she would talk about sidewalks and human scale and mixed use. But I think she would go much further and push us to seriously undo the damage of auto-focused planning. These are hard fixes that will take public sector leadership, not just responsible real estate development.

For example, how about returning all four of Durham's major one ways (Roxboro, Mangum, Duke, Gregson) and the Loop to two-way streets? That could transform block after block of the city. How about simply tearing out the Durham Freeway for a mile or two either side of downtown? Other major cities are doing just that, by creating beautiful boulevards and linear parks. Such ambitious projects undoubtedly will be tackled by future generations of forward-thinking Durhamites—and Jane Jacobs will be smiling.

Fred Broadwell, Durham

Latest in Letters to the Editor

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor



Twitter Activity

Most Recent Comments

Thank you cleverweist1 and Cristel Gutshchenritter Orrand for the opportunity to stand up for what I believe in as a …

by half full on A Massive Scar (Letters to the Editor)

Mr Pollock makes some good points .
Noam Chomsky and Ron Paul have similar views on wars we have waged …

by CHHS Tiger on History you won't like either (Letters to the Editor)

Sadly, this letter, while well-meaning, is deeply flawed. The background check gun control law has failed but it can never …

by ProudlyUnaffiliated on No new gun laws! (Letters to the Editor)

For the life of me, I do not understand why folks keep yelling about their 2nd Amendment rights as though …

by cityfox on No new gun laws! (Letters to the Editor)

It seems the real problem with the guns is that the wrong people can get them illegally by : stealing …

by CHHS Tiger on No new gun laws! (Letters to the Editor)

Comments

Thank you cleverweist1 and Cristel Gutshchenritter Orrand for the opportunity to stand up for what I believe in as a …

by half full on A Massive Scar (Letters to the Editor)

Mr Pollock makes some good points .
Noam Chomsky and Ron Paul have similar views on wars we have waged …

by CHHS Tiger on History you won't like either (Letters to the Editor)

Most Read

  1. Smug Revisionism (Letters to the Editor)
  2. Dot-con (Peripheral Visions)

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation