Jane Gray | Candidate Questionnaires | Indy Week
Pin It

Jane Gray 

N.C. Court of Appeals

Full Legal Name: Jane Powell Gray

Name as it Appears on the Ballot: Jane Gray

Seat Sought: Court of Appeals, Calabria seat

Partisan Affiliation: This is a nonpartisan race, but I am a registered Democrat

Date of Birth: November 21, 1949

Home Address: 3805 Casey Leigh Lane Raleigh, NC 27612

Mailing Address (if different from home): PO Box 12969 Raleigh, NC 27605

Campaign Web Site: www.judgejanegray.com

Occupation & Employer: Wake County District Court Judge; State of NC

Bachelor's Degree Year & Institution: 1972; University of Florida

JD Year & School: 1979; Campbell University School of Law

Other Degrees:

Years lived in North Carolina: 37

Home Phone: (919) 781-8951

Work Phone: (919) 792-4800

Email: jane@judgejanegray.com


1. What are your top priorities or issues of concern for the coming term? In addition to writing clear, concise opinions in general, I am committed to making sure that opinions in juvenile abuse, neglect, dependency cases are handled as expeditiously as possible and with as much consistency as possible.

2. What qualifies you to serve? Over thirty years of legal experience, including almost 20 in the Attorney General's Office where I wrote numerous criminal and civil briefs and argued them in the Court of Appeals and Supreme Court. I have a strong work ethic and am committed to bearing my share of the heavy workload of the Court of Appeals.

3. How do you define yourself politically? How does that impact your judicial approach? Outside of court I am involved in my community, state and nation as a member of my party, but there is no place for partisan politics in the courtroom. I have taken an oath to view matters before me with impartiality and fairness and this is my goal every day.

4. FOR INCUMBENTS: What have been your most important decisions in your current capacity? FOR CHALLENGERS: What decisions has the incumbent made that you most disagree with? As a challenger, I most disagree with State v. Jones, 161 NC App 60 (2003) – finding that possession of cocaine is a misdemeanor rather than a felony (The Supreme Court overruled the decision) and State v. Scott, 187 NC App 775 (2007) – dissenting opinion – contending that a man charged with a probation violation had waived his right to be represented by an attorney despite his assertion that he could not afford to hire one.

5. What do you feel was the U.S. Supreme Court's most important recent decision? Did you agree with the majority? What is the role of that court in setting precedent for North Carolina's appellate courts? Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 08-205 (1/21/10). I did not agree with the majority for the reasons stated in Section I of the dissent. The majority ignored the fact that the appellant had abandoned its challenge to the constitutionality of the statute as written. The decision likely invalidates similar campaign finance laws in all fifty states and leaves Congress and state legislatures with the task of trying to figure out what, if any, restrictions can be placed on corporate and union spending in elections.

US Supreme Court rulings interpreting the US Constitution and federal statutes are binding on NC appellate courts.

6. Do you feel that North Carolina's current system of judicial elections serves the state well? Are there other forms of selecting judges you feel would function better or worse than the current one? I believe a merit selection system with a voter retention election at the conclusion of the appointed term is preferable. I support the efforts of the NC Bar Association which is trying to forge a coalition among the legal profession, the General Assembly, the Governor, the Chief Justice, and others to draft a bill to amend the state Constitution to this end.

7. Have you ever pled guilty or no contest to any criminal charge other than a minor traffic offense? Please explain. No.

8. Identify a principled stand you might be willing to take if elected that you suspect might cost you some popularity points with voters.

I do not consider whether a decision I make is popular with voters; I do my best to apply the rule of law in every case. Thus, I would never write an opinion just to "earn" popularity points if the law was not supportive of the opinion or avoid writing one that might be unpopular when the law clearly mandates it.

9. Do you favor or oppose applying a plain error review to all alleged errors in capital cases? Do you favor or oppose mandating appellate review in post-conviction capital cases to help avoid arbitrariness in review of post-conviction capital cases by superior court judges? Please explain

Capital cases do not come before the NC Court of Appeals, so these questions are not applicable to this office.

  • N.C. Court of Appeals

Latest in Candidate Questionnaires

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Candidate Questionnaires



Twitter Activity

Most Recent Comments

"Judge" Christine Walczyk is a criminal with a robe and gavel, sitting on her perch and violating her oath of …

by STOP_Criminals_on_the_Bench on Christine Walczyk (Candidate Questionnaires)

I wonder how many weeks this campaign will continue. In the meantime, if the allegations have merit, I'm sure the …

by ct on Christine Walczyk (Candidate Questionnaires)

Judge Christine Walczyk of the Wake County Courts is CORRUPT. I am not the Plaintiff or Defendant in the case …

by Stop Corruption on Christine Walczyk (Candidate Questionnaires)

Corruption in the Wake County Courts by Judge Christine Walczyk. Judge Christine Walczyk of the Wake County Courts thinks she …

by Corrupt Judge Christine Walczyk of the Wake County Courts on Christine Walczyk (Candidate Questionnaires)

Judge Christine Walczyk's spouse recently wrote a post on a Court of Appeals Judge's Facebook that she is such a …

by Impeach Judge Christine Walczyk on Christine Walczyk (Candidate Questionnaires)

Comments

"Judge" Christine Walczyk is a criminal with a robe and gavel, sitting on her perch and violating her oath of …

by STOP_Criminals_on_the_Bench on Christine Walczyk (Candidate Questionnaires)

I wonder how many weeks this campaign will continue. In the meantime, if the allegations have merit, I'm sure the …

by ct on Christine Walczyk (Candidate Questionnaires)

Most Read

No recently-read stories.

Visit the archives…

© 2017 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation