INDY aces urban planning | Letters to the Editor | Indy Week
Pin It

INDY aces urban planning 

I really enjoyed the article ("The Rabble Are Roused," July 15). It "nailed" the essential issues and was quite funny in an understated way. You apparently have knowledge of the way cities work (or don't work).

I have always regarded Raleigh as a group of fine residential suburbs in search of a city. Its citizens say they want the trappings of a city but demur when it comes to the side effects of higher density: Noise, entertainment, crowded sidewalks, neon signs and all the activities, legal or illegal, that make streets a living theater.

Having sat on the Planning Commission, I resigned when I felt that the planning department was rubber stamping the developer's plans. The UDO is well intentioned, and should in my opinion lead to a better and more vital city, but I do not feel that it is necessary to grant carte blanche to developers by rezoning whole districts ahead of need. I know that this helps infrastructure planning, and it is required by administrative precedent for comprehensive planning, but it seems to me that the process should allow for temporary zoning status. In this way the developer must apply for permanent re-zoning according to the UDO rather than move into a ready-made higher density designation. Call me foolish, but I think we have created a development bonanza in Raleigh.

The drawings exhibited to the Planning Commission were "tarted up" to create an impression of variety. Since the public cannot read these types of drawings (and the developer would rather not show them), the project goes up before the real impact of the building on the street is manifest. I have seen this happen in North Hills, Cameron Village and Centennial Campus when I sat on the commission.

Peter Batchelor, Raleigh

The writer is a fellow at the American Institute of Certified Planners, the American Institute of Architects and Emeritus Professor of Architecture and Urban Design at N.C. State.

Latest in Letters to the Editor

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor



Twitter Activity

Most Recent Comments

Thank you cleverweist1 and Cristel Gutshchenritter Orrand for the opportunity to stand up for what I believe in as a …

by half full on A Massive Scar (Letters to the Editor)

Mr Pollock makes some good points .
Noam Chomsky and Ron Paul have similar views on wars we have waged …

by CHHS Tiger on History you won't like either (Letters to the Editor)

Sadly, this letter, while well-meaning, is deeply flawed. The background check gun control law has failed but it can never …

by ProudlyUnaffiliated on No new gun laws! (Letters to the Editor)

For the life of me, I do not understand why folks keep yelling about their 2nd Amendment rights as though …

by cityfox on No new gun laws! (Letters to the Editor)

It seems the real problem with the guns is that the wrong people can get them illegally by : stealing …

by CHHS Tiger on No new gun laws! (Letters to the Editor)

Comments

Thank you cleverweist1 and Cristel Gutshchenritter Orrand for the opportunity to stand up for what I believe in as a …

by half full on A Massive Scar (Letters to the Editor)

Mr Pollock makes some good points .
Noam Chomsky and Ron Paul have similar views on wars we have waged …

by CHHS Tiger on History you won't like either (Letters to the Editor)

Most Read

  1. Dot-con (Peripheral Visions)
  2. Smug Revisionism (Letters to the Editor)

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation