Independence from what? | Letters to the Editor | Indy Week
Pin It

Independence from what? 

Sue Sturgis' article ("9 ways YOU can achieve energy independence," July 5) shows a healthy change in Indy attitude from the days, not long ago, when the Indy promoted the newest fad of going out to dinner by driving around the Triangle and eating each course in a different restaurant.

Still, the Sturgis article has some problems. On the one hand, Sturgis has set the bar too high. The huge majority of people I know aren't anywhere close to thinking about an energy efficient house; they can't even be bothered to push the little "off" button on their computer screen at the end of the day. On the other hand, Sturgis' article sets the bar too low by encouraging readers to believe that her nine tips will save the Earth. The article states that "you can achieve energy independence." Independence from what? That oversized "GreenHome" in the photo certainly isn't energy independent. It took a huge amount of energy to process and haul all the raw materials that house is made of. Timber, shingles, insulation, skylights, heat pump--were any of these produced by one of the many weakly regulated corporations that are devastating the environment?

The article states that the nine energy saving tips "are more than enough to stem the tide." What a gross overstatement! In reality, environmental scientists agree that we can't predict with any accuracy what the future will bring and when it will bring it. While you don't want to discourage people from greening up their lives, you also don't want to make them feel self-satisfied because they put solar panels on their 4,000-square-foot house. In my book, you get to feel self-satisfied about your contribution to the environment after you've followed all nine of Sturgis' tips, selected to have only one child, divested your retirement funds from corporate polluters, and achieved a level of energy consumption that could be used by all 6 billion people on the planet without causing global warming.

Bercedis Peterson
Durham

Latest in Letters to the Editor

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor



Twitter Activity

Most Recent Comments

Thank you cleverweist1 and Cristel Gutshchenritter Orrand for the opportunity to stand up for what I believe in as a …

by half full on A Massive Scar (Letters to the Editor)

Mr Pollock makes some good points .
Noam Chomsky and Ron Paul have similar views on wars we have waged …

by CHHS Tiger on History you won't like either (Letters to the Editor)

Sadly, this letter, while well-meaning, is deeply flawed. The background check gun control law has failed but it can never …

by ProudlyUnaffiliated on No new gun laws! (Letters to the Editor)

For the life of me, I do not understand why folks keep yelling about their 2nd Amendment rights as though …

by cityfox on No new gun laws! (Letters to the Editor)

It seems the real problem with the guns is that the wrong people can get them illegally by : stealing …

by CHHS Tiger on No new gun laws! (Letters to the Editor)

Comments

Thank you cleverweist1 and Cristel Gutshchenritter Orrand for the opportunity to stand up for what I believe in as a …

by half full on A Massive Scar (Letters to the Editor)

Mr Pollock makes some good points .
Noam Chomsky and Ron Paul have similar views on wars we have waged …

by CHHS Tiger on History you won't like either (Letters to the Editor)

Most Read

  1. Dot-con (Peripheral Visions)
  2. Smug Revisionism (Letters to the Editor)

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation