How much is a pet's life worth? Nothing. | North Carolina | Indy Week
Pin It

How much is a pet's life worth? Nothing. 

In August, the N.C. Industrial Commission was confronted with a question: How much is a pet's life worth?

This week, Deputy Commissioner George T. Glenn II answered: Nothing.

"I'm fascinated by a ruling that says there's no value," says animal law attorney Calley Gerber of Raleigh. "If it was any other item of property, I don't think there'd be an industry allowed to charge you tens of thousands of dollars for something that wasn't worth anything. You couldn't do it for a car, you couldn't' do it for a condemned house, but they will for a beloved companion animal."

Gerber represents Herbert and Nancy Shera of Wilmington, whose cherished 13-year-old Jack Russell terrier, Laci, died while under N.C. State Veterinary Teaching Hospital care in 2007, due to admitted negligence by doctors treating her.

The Sheras are seeking compensatory damages valued at $28,243, which is how much they paid for Laci's medical care since 2003 when she developed liver cancer.

The state attorney's office argued that the Sheras were owed nothing for Laci's "intrinsic value," just $505—$350 for a new dog, based on prices listed in newspaper classifieds—and $155 in cremation costs.

Glenn awarded $2,755.72, the amount of the final veterinary bill.

The Sheras say they will appeal the ruling.

"I can't give up. I will never give up," Nancy Shera says. "We have to see this through."

Gerber has 15 days to file the appeal. She then has time to review the official court transcripts before ferreting out and challenging individual mistakes.

She can already list several, she says.

For instance, the ruling states that the surgery for Laci's liver cancer took place in Wilmington, where the Sheras live. However, the operation took place in Cary, at the former N.C. State vet school location.

"That's a 110-mile error," Herb Shera says. "That's a biggie, as far as I'm concerned, because I had to drive it back and forth."

The ruling also states that Laci was suffering from multiple life-threatening illnesses when the Sheras brought her to N.C. State. But it was a misplaced feeding tube, not a disease, that killed Laci.

The Sheras say no one told them about a life-threatening disease until after Laci died.

"It wasn't until she was deceased that they decided she was on death's doorstep," Gerber says.

The Sheras say that they brought Laci for treatment because she had trouble urinating but that she didn't begin to deteriorate until under N.C. State's care.

The initial appeal will be heard in the Industrial Commission. If it fails, the Sheras plan to pursue the case in the N.C. Court of Appeals.

Legal bills already far surpass the amount they are requesting in the suit, but the goal for the Sheras and Gerber is to establish a legal precedent that pets have intrinsic value.

Under current law, pets are treated as personal property, meaning owners are entitled to the amount a willing buyer would pay a willing seller for the animal or property in question.

Gerber argues that there's no market for adult dogs and that the intrinsic value to the owner should be applied.

"We intend to do it all," Herb says of the appeals. "Not because we particularly want to, but because it's necessary."

"Money was never the object anyway," Nancy Shera adds. "It was to make a statement and to change the law."

  • "Money was never the object anyway. It was to make a statement and to change the law."

Comments (4)

Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in North Carolina



Twitter Activity

Most Recent Comments

Pay to play is alive and well in NC...only time voters matter is at election...Then the lies begin.

by Tony Dockery on What’s Standing Between Rural North Carolina and Reliable Internet Service? (North Carolina)

Jackson is just another republican creep who likes his slave labor...I am not surprised by this....This is how they govern......The …

by Tony Dockery on The U.S. Department of Labor Hits a State Senator’s Farm with a Conspicuously Small Fine (North Carolina)

Who are Jackson Farming Company's customers? Seems like this is the only place to apply pressure.

by Donald Chartier on The U.S. Department of Labor Hits a State Senator’s Farm with a Conspicuously Small Fine (North Carolina)

I know how many feel. I live between Benson and Highway 210. The only internet available, except satellite, is CenturyLink. …

by Kitty Hegemann 1 on What’s Standing Between Rural North Carolina and Reliable Internet Service? (North Carolina)

Missed Dr. LUEBKE today at UNC. I know he would have introduced the President of the United States as they …

by bethlalonde@yahoo.com on RIP Paul Luebke, a Progressive Icon (North Carolina)

Comments

Pay to play is alive and well in NC...only time voters matter is at election...Then the lies begin.

by Tony Dockery on What’s Standing Between Rural North Carolina and Reliable Internet Service? (North Carolina)

Jackson is just another republican creep who likes his slave labor...I am not surprised by this....This is how they govern......The …

by Tony Dockery on The U.S. Department of Labor Hits a State Senator’s Farm with a Conspicuously Small Fine (North Carolina)

Most Read

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation