Forget Politicians. Durham Wants to Talk about the Elections Process. | Triangulator | Indy Week
Pin It

Forget Politicians. Durham Wants to Talk about the Elections Process. 

voting.jpg

Most election years, you focus on politicians. But this year, the Durham City Council is taking a different spin on things. It wants to focus on process.

Right now, Durham uses a nonpartisan primary; parties don't have a formal role. Instead, all candidates battle it out, and the top vote-getters move on to the general. According to council member Don Moffitt, the city spent $400,000 on elections in 2015.

The city has considered tinkering with elections before. In 2009, the Durham County Board of Elections asked the city to switch to what's called a nonpartisan plurality—meaning the top vote-getter in one election would be declared the winner, with no requirement that the winner achieve a majority or even get a certain percentage of the vote. In a memo back then, city attorney Patrick Baker said it was the only "municipal election process that guarantees no more than one election" will be held. This proved a very unpopular idea, and, after a public hearing, the council opted not to change things.

Now, while there's no single proposal being floated, some officials are wondering if there's not a better way to handle elections. At a work session last week, councilman Eddie Davis asked for a future discussion about potential changes to the elections process. Council member Jillian Johnson, meanwhile, brought up the ranked-choice and instant-runoff voting, options favored by many progressive reformers nationwide. (Baker said he'd have to check if that ran afoul of state restrictions.)

Don't worry: if there is a change, it won't impact anything this year. You've got enough election-related headaches to deal with.

triangulator@indyweek.com

  • Eliminate the runoff? Instant runoff voting? Changes may be coming to Durham elections—just not anytime soon

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Triangulator



Twitter Activity

Most Recent Comments

They are doing this for the exact same reason P.E. Trump is tweeting disparaging comments about the votes cast in …

by Sogno on A Desperate Pat McCrory Makes His Last Stand (Triangulator)

My grandmother would have me to cut a switch and give it to her when I misbehaved. I believe it …

by cityfox on A Desperate Pat McCrory Makes His Last Stand (Triangulator)

I know it's a little late, but to note the Indy's crystal-ball gazers and analyzers of Tar Heel state politics …

by Rataplan on Will Donald Trump’s Collapse Drag Down These Five N.C. Republicans? (Triangulator)

Promoting and supporting poor policy, like voter suppression, HB2, and extremely poor coal ash regulation, is despicable but human. Attempting …

by DR B on A Desperate Pat McCrory Makes His Last Stand (Triangulator)

Really though, this bolding thing is annoying.

by kevan on How Did Mike Morgan Win? (Triangulator)

Comments

They are doing this for the exact same reason P.E. Trump is tweeting disparaging comments about the votes cast in …

by Sogno on A Desperate Pat McCrory Makes His Last Stand (Triangulator)

My grandmother would have me to cut a switch and give it to her when I misbehaved. I believe it …

by cityfox on A Desperate Pat McCrory Makes His Last Stand (Triangulator)

Most Read

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation