Errata | Letters to the Editor | Indy Week
Pin It

Errata 

Barry Yeoman's article focusing on Ken Hamm and his group ("Creation Nation," Feb. 22) was a great way to shine a little more light on the existence and motivations of a group of people that I don't agree with, but certainly want to know more about. Still, it doesn't help when we make a common and minor error that serves to further mislead people into thinking that Darwin's work was focused on Humans as some sort of pinnacle of either creation or evolution.

Darwin's most famous work was properly titled On the Origin of Species, not (as cited in Yeoman's article) On the Origin of the Species. Adding that extra word makes it sound as if Darwin's focus was on "the" species, in this case referring to modern humans. Darwin's work had more to do with finches than people, and he was trying to show the mechanism of speciation over time, not necessarily that humans came from a specific progenitor.

It's just one word, but dropping that small word misleads people about the focus of Darwin's work. Understanding natural selection is not about proving or disproving the existence of God or the origin of the universe. It's not even necessarily about the origin of humankind, no matter what "the" press tells us.

Britt Steed

Raleigh

Latest in Letters to the Editor

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor



Twitter Activity

Comments

If the headline had been: "Is Scott Crawford Better Off Without Standard Food"? The answer would have been a resounding …

by Sue Mixson on Plate Expectations (Letters to the Editor)

Emma Laperruque and your response to this situation have been very unprofessional. Seeing the way both your organization and she …

by TayWoo on Plate Expectations (Letters to the Editor)

Most Read

  1. Massed Mascots (Peripheral Visions)
  2. "Your Citizenship Should Be Revoked" (Letters to the Editor)

Most Recent Comments

If the headline had been: "Is Scott Crawford Better Off Without Standard Food"? The answer would have been a resounding …

by Sue Mixson on Plate Expectations (Letters to the Editor)

Emma Laperruque and your response to this situation have been very unprofessional. Seeing the way both your organization and she …

by TayWoo on Plate Expectations (Letters to the Editor)

Please, Mr. Keen, inform us on what kind of person Hilary Clinton is. But please leave out the innuendo, unsupported …

by GorSun on Smug Revisionism (Letters to the Editor)

Thank you cleverweist1 and Cristel Gutshchenritter Orrand for the opportunity to stand up for what I believe in as a …

by half full on A Massive Scar (Letters to the Editor)

Mr Pollock makes some good points .
Noam Chomsky and Ron Paul have similar views on wars we have waged …

by CHHS Tiger on History you won't like either (Letters to the Editor)

© 2017 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation