Edwards battling Clinton on Iraq, Iran | Edwards Watch | Indy Week
Pin It

Edwards battling Clinton on Iraq, Iran 

click to enlarge edwards.gif

John Edwards is slipping in Iowa. Bill Richardson's pecking away there at his anti-war credentials, and Hillary Clinton is gaining—she leads Edwards in the latest Des Moines Register poll by 6 percentage points. This is potentially ruinous for Edwards, for whom Iowa is absolutely a must-win.

On NBC's Meet the Press Sunday, Edwards set out to repair the damage by subtly adjusting his Iraq position, making Richardson's Iraq policy sound silly, and calling Clinton's stance on Iraq "very similar to what President Bush says." That's the trifecta if Edwards can pull it off. He's also going after Clinton on Iran.

MTP's Tim Russert noted that, after the New Hampshire debate, "Democrats [were] somewhat surprised" that their top three candidates—Clinton, Edwards and Barack Obama—won't pledge to have all American troops out of Iraq by 2013. Richardson had pounced on Edwards, saying his plan to remove all "combat" troops in a year "is not ending the war." Is Richardson correct? Russert asked.

"Of course he's not correct," Edwards answered, adding that the only troops he'll leave will guard the embassy in Baghdad. Did Richardson really propose to make it "the only American embassy in the world that we provide no protection for"? Edwards went on to discuss the "quick reaction forces" he's previously said should be in the region hunting for terrorists. Edwards had never specified where those troops would be—presumably wherever the terrorists are—but Sunday he said that none would be stationed in Iraq. They'd be "just outside ... probably in Kuwait." Edwards said his position is unlike that of Clinton, who's for keeping combat troops in Iraq: "To me, that is a continuation of the war."

Clinton's stated position: She'd retain "a vastly reduced residual force" to train Iraqi forces, provide logistical support and conduct counter-terrorism operations.

On Iran, Edwards is ripping Clinton for her vote in favor of the Kyl-Lieberman amendment labeling Iran's military a terrorist organization. Clinton says the measure in no way empowers President Bush to use force against Iran. But Edwards says Bush, who's labeled Iran an enemy in the war on terror, can't be trusted to use good sense this time, any more than he did in 2002 when Congress authorized the use of force in Iraq. "We learned a very different lesson from that" 2002 vote, Edwards said of Clinton. "I have no intention of giving George Bush the authority to take the first step on a road to war with Iran."

  • John Edwards is slipping in Iowa.

Comments

Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Edwards Watch



Twitter Activity

Most Recent Comments

I agree - John Edwards is part of the health care problem. His ridiculous settlements with insurance companies makes Healthcare …

by tomgee on Why Edwards' policies caught on, but he didn't (Edwards Watch)

People seem to not realize the cost of John's great wealth from those law suits will be passed down to …

by ZEN on Why Edwards' policies caught on, but he didn't (Edwards Watch)

GO-GO-GO GEORGE EDWARDS

by graurog on Still 47 states to go for Edwards (Edwards Watch)

Very good piece. I wish the media would have more discussions like this for the voters. I think any progressive …

by pmorlan on Edwards vs. Obama: Up with history (Edwards Watch)

Ron who?

by JohnD on On the ropes (Edwards Watch)

Comments

I agree - John Edwards is part of the health care problem. His ridiculous settlements with insurance companies makes Healthcare …

by tomgee on Why Edwards' policies caught on, but he didn't (Edwards Watch)

People seem to not realize the cost of John's great wealth from those law suits will be passed down to …

by ZEN on Why Edwards' policies caught on, but he didn't (Edwards Watch)

Most Read

No recently-read stories.

Visit the archives…

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation