Durham regulating sweepstakes parlors | Durham County | Indy Week
Pin It

Durham regulating sweepstakes parlors 

New Internet sweepstakes parlors inside the Durham city limits will have to locate at least 500 feet—about a block and a half—from day cares, parks, schools, churches and homes. The parlors also must be 500 feet away from another gaming establishment.

Durham City Council voted 6-0 Monday night to amend the Unified Development Ordinance to clarify where the parlors, also knowns as electronic gaming establishments, can do business. The parlors are designated under the "Indoor Recreation" category and can operate in commercial and light industrial zoning districts where bars and nightclubs are also allowed. However, no alcohol is permitted in the parlors, according to the ordinance.

Existing parlors are grandfathered, meaning they are exempt from the ordinance unless they move.

Video gambling has been illegal in North Carolina since 2007, but Internet sweepstakes parlors, in which players can enter an online game to win a prize, are allowed. The parlors are unrelated to the N.C. Education Lottery, which is also legal.

The General Assembly outlawed the parlors in 2010, but a recent court ruling overturned the state statute on First Amendment grounds.

Related Events

  • Durham County Commissioners @ Durham County Govt Complex

    • Second and Fourth Monday of every month, 7 p.m.
    • 1 going/interested

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Durham County



Twitter Activity

Most Recent Comments

Light rail is a fun idea, but definitely not cost effective to build, maintain or use. The upcoming infrastructure spending …

by alberthall on Donald Trump Promised Big Bucks for Infrastructure. Could That Save Light Rail? (Durham County)

The question should be do the taxpayers want to save this project? It's late and getting later, it's over budget …

by where's the beef? on Donald Trump Promised Big Bucks for Infrastructure. Could That Save Light Rail? (Durham County)

I hope Trump doesn't waste a single penny of taxpayer money on this boondoggle. I hope this whole thing dies …

by John Trololo on Donald Trump Promised Big Bucks for Infrastructure. Could That Save Light Rail? (Durham County)

Donald Trump made many grandiose promises. Some, like Mexico paying for the wall, were blatantly hollow from the start. Lying …

by DR B on Donald Trump Promised Big Bucks for Infrastructure. Could That Save Light Rail? (Durham County)

The article poses a question: "Is Emerald City a Nuisance to Its Lakewood Neighbors, Or Is It Just in the …

by Spindy on Is Emerald City a Nuisance to Its Lakewood Neighbors, Or Is It Just in the Way? (Durham County)

Comments

Light rail is a fun idea, but definitely not cost effective to build, maintain or use. The upcoming infrastructure spending …

by alberthall on Donald Trump Promised Big Bucks for Infrastructure. Could That Save Light Rail? (Durham County)

The question should be do the taxpayers want to save this project? It's late and getting later, it's over budget …

by where's the beef? on Donald Trump Promised Big Bucks for Infrastructure. Could That Save Light Rail? (Durham County)

© 2017 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation