Defending recent impeachment debate | Letters to the Editor | Indy Week
Pin It

Defending recent impeachment debate 

As one of the organizers of the impeachment debate, I would like to respond to the letter "Impeachment debate lacked debate" (Letters to the Editor, Jan. 30). We never promised a debate on the lawfulness or unlawfulness of the Bush administration. We simply advertised a debate that presented the pros and cons of impeachment.

The debate sprang from a meeting with U.S. Rep. David Price (D-4th District) in August 2007, in which we asked him to take a leadership position in advocating for the immediate start of impeachment hearings against both President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney. We made a strong and solid case that our country was in a constitutional crisis. Price, while agreeing that this was "the worst administration in the history of our country," claimed that Congress was pursuing tactics equal to impeachment that would hold this administration accountable. He never cited any specifics, but was adamant that impeachment would "suck the oxygen" out of our democracy.

On the way out of the meeting, Price's aides handed us an article by Michael Tomasky titled "The Dumbest Move the Dems Could Make."

Our group then crafted this debate specifically to explore the pros and cons of impeachment in the context set forth to us by our own representative, which echoes the response that has filtered down from the national Democratic leadership.

In our opinion, there is no debate as to whether the Bush administration has committed acts that should trigger impeachment hearings. Torture, illegal wiretapping, lying to Congress and outing a CIA agent are a few acts that need true investigations. The real debate is in the minds and souls of our representatives. Will they take a courageous and principled stance and act on the oath they took to uphold the Constitution, to protect it from all enemies foreign and domestic?

Rebecca Cerese
Coalition for the Constitution

  • We never promised a debate on the lawfulness or unlawfulness of the Bush administration.

Latest in Letters to the Editor


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor

Twitter Activity


Thank you cleverweist1 and Cristel Gutshchenritter Orrand for the opportunity to stand up for what I believe in as a …

by half full on A Massive Scar (Letters to the Editor)

Mr Pollock makes some good points .
Noam Chomsky and Ron Paul have similar views on wars we have waged …

by CHHS Tiger on History you won't like either (Letters to the Editor)

Most Read

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation