Chatham County voters defeat redistricting plan; Tom Vanderbeck wins District 4 commissioners' seat | Chatham County | Indy Week
Pin It

Chatham County voters defeat redistricting plan; Tom Vanderbeck wins District 4 commissioners' seat 

The controversy over district voting fractured Chatham County by ideology and geography, politics and race. After more than a year of sniping, some of it voiced on the county's populist online venue, the Chatham Chatlist, the referendum to replace at-large voting with a district system was defeated by a 54-45 margin.

"I guess you guys can be proud that you finished the job," wrote a disappointed district voting supporter on the Chatlist last week.

In place since the late 1970s, at-large voting is largely credited with opening the political process to African Americans. District voting, referendum opponents charged, would undo that progress, although former Democratic Party chairwoman, Mary Nettles, who is black, disputed that claim, an indicator of how divisive the issue had become even within the African-American community. (See "Fault lines," Oct. 18, 2006.)

"It got ugly," said Delcenia Turner, an African-American opponent of district voting. "It's still ugly. The people who lost and really wanted this are angry."

The vote fell along geographic lines. As expected, precincts in the northern and northeastern parts of the county, which would have been underrepresented in the district system, voted heavily against the referendum. At Harpers Crossroads, in southwestern Chatham, 93 percent of votes cast were for district voting, which proponents said would give less-populated western precincts a more equal voice in politics.

The vote is also important because newly elected county commissioners can reconfigure district lines that earlier this summer had been redrawn by a politically motivated redistricting commission.

When new commissioners Tom Vanderbeck, George Lucier and Carl Thompson are sworn in Dec. 4, the hope is that their outreach can mend a county unraveled by the referendum. Already, some are extending the olive branch. Jeffrey Starkweather, chair of the Chatham Coalition, which opposed district voting, told Chatlist readers that "It's clear that we have much in common: an abiding love for Chatham—our human and natural resources, special way of life and rural character."

Crunching Chatham's numbers

TURNOUT

  • Total: 47 percent (17,758 of 37,601 voters)

REDISTRICTING REFERENDUM

  • Yes: 45.4 percent
  • No: 54.5 percent
  • Highest referendum turnout: Carolina Meadow (55 percent) and Bennett (48 percent)
  • Lowest referendum turnout: East Siler City (28 percent) and North Williams (29 percent).
  • Highest percentage of "yes" votes: Harpers Crossroads (93 percent) and Bennett (91 percent)
  • Highest percentage of "no" votes: West Williams (85 percent) and Carolina Meadows (76 percent)
  • Percentage of voters who cast ballots on the referendum: 72 percent

Source: Orange County Board of Elections. Results are unofficial until Nov. 17. —Lisa Sorg

  • The controversy over district voting fractured Chatham County by ideology and geography, politics and race.

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Chatham County



Twitter Activity

Most Recent Comments

@Goaglen, Just ignore Tony D. He's The Indy's resident left-wing troll. Every time he comments he drops swear words and …

by Dude on Chatham County has a plan to stop frackers. Can it possibly work? (Chatham County)

As to the issue of fracturing for gas and oil deposits, this rag and the opposition to the practice deny …

by Goaglen on Chatham County has a plan to stop frackers. Can it possibly work? (Chatham County)

Tony D, How about a mutually beneficial deal? You get rid of the (what did you call our governor?) as***g …

by Goaglen on Chatham County has a plan to stop frackers. Can it possibly work? (Chatham County)

The people in that part of the county have the right to deny zoning. They do not want it. That …

by Goaglen on Half of Chatham County Has No Zoning Restrictions. That Could Soon Change. (Chatham County)

After 3 years in marriage with my Husband with a kid, my husband started going out with other ladies and …

by Cathey Isidra on To save his marriage, a domestic abuser gives PEACE a chance (Chatham County)

Comments

@Goaglen, Just ignore Tony D. He's The Indy's resident left-wing troll. Every time he comments he drops swear words and …

by Dude on Chatham County has a plan to stop frackers. Can it possibly work? (Chatham County)

As to the issue of fracturing for gas and oil deposits, this rag and the opposition to the practice deny …

by Goaglen on Chatham County has a plan to stop frackers. Can it possibly work? (Chatham County)

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation