Carrboro takes on neighborhood covenants in the name of sustainability | Orange County | Indy Week
Pin It

Carrboro takes on neighborhood covenants in the name of sustainability 

Green living hung up

Sharon Kolling-Perin just wanted a clothesline. The 31-year-old Carrboro mother of three thought hanging her family's clothes out in the yard rather than stuffing them into an electric dryer would be an environmentally friendly way to get some household chores done. But a maze of neighborhood, city and state regulations have taken her simple request all the way to the General Assembly.

Kolling-Perin lives in Roberson Place, a neighborhood governed in part by homeowners' association covenants. The covenants, like most other documents of their kind, restrict what residents may do with their property, including installing so-called "sustainability features" like clotheslines.

Rules like these are meant to protect property owners from less tidy neighbors, whose unsightly yard ornaments or garish color choices could conceivably lower property values for those around them. But Kolling-Perin was surprised to learn that her environmentally friendly community wouldn't allow a clothesline, even temporarily.

"Many of us moved here because of how liberal it is," she said. "Carrboro is a place where you can live your politics."

Kolling-Perin contacted Carrboro Mayor Mark Chilton to see if the town had a process for circumventing homeowners' association rules when it came to environmentally friendly home improvements. Carrboro had no such law, but Chilton and the Board of Aldermen thought well enough of the notion to take it up as an issue.

"People in Carrboro take sustainability very seriously and want to be able to be a community on the leading edge," Alderman Dan Coleman said.

"This is an issue that alternative energy groups have been advocating for some time," Chilton said. "If you need to go around [homeowners' association rules] to help our community become a more environmentally sound place to live, we think that's more important than some neighborhood covenants."

In 2007, the N.C. General Assembly passed a law overriding neighborhood covenants on solar panels in most circumstances, but Chilton indicated he felt that measure didn't go far enough.

North Carolina law prohibits municipalities from creating many ordinances without permission from the state legislature, so in January, the Aldermen sought support from local legislators, including House Speaker Joe Hackney, Rep. Verla Insko and Sen. Ellie Kinnaird. At a Feb. 17 public hearing, the board formally requested the change, despite vocal opposition from homeowner groups.

"Everybody has to be allowed to go green, but it needs to be looked at differently in each neighborhood," said Richard Anstine, president of the Fair Oaks Homeowners' Association. Stressing that he attended the meeting on his own volition and not to voice the organized opposition of his association, Anstine said Carrboro's request is misguided. "When you buy a home, you pay attention to the homeowners' covenants. For them to say, 'We can do what we want to do in the name of green living,' that seems very heavy-handed."

Anstine said homeowners' associations, not the town's elected leaders, should have the authority to decide what additions residents can make to their homes in the name of sustainability. But Kolling-Perin said she investigated that possibility, with unsatisfactory results. The Roberson Place homeowners' association requires a 75 percent majority vote to change its covenant, which Kolling-Perin said is nearly impossible to get, since few residents attend the meetings.

"A lot of homeowners feel the way I do," she said. "But people who want things to change are just waiting for the covenant to run out."

Aldermen are asking for the authority to "provide by ordinance that no deed restriction or covenant can have the effect of limiting or prohibiting the use of green or sustainability features on a residential property." Anstine and other critics argue the request is vague, and worry it would allow residents to put up almost anything, no matter how unsightly (residential wind turbines, for example). But Coleman stressed that the initiative is still in a preliminary phase, and no law would be enacted without more public input.

"It's important to be clear that what we're seeking is the authority to create an ordinance," he said. "There's no firm idea what it might entail."

Insko, who will likely introduce the House version of Carrboro's request, said local bills such as this usually pass without much debate, but she wasn't entirely comfortable with it yet.

"When we run a local bill, we prefer it not be controversial back home," Insko said. "Those are our constituents, too."

Insko wants to put more protections for covenants into the bill before introducing it.

"To me, the big issue is if we want the General Assembly overriding homeowners' associations," she said.

Environmental groups would like to see more—rather than less—provisions for homeowners to install sustainability features, said Julie Robinson of the N.C. Sustainable Energy Association.

"We believe that it is very unfortunate that so many North Carolinians are not allowed to contribute to our economy and our future by generating their own power," Robinson wrote in an e-mail. "Installing renewable energy technologies ... puts local people to work ... and conserves our valuable resources."

Insko said she and Kinnaird will likely introduce some version of the bill within the next few weeks. If it passes, Coleman and Chilton indicated there will be a prolonged series of discussions on its specifics.

Until then, Kolling-Perin—and homeowners like her—will have to settle for the dryer.

Comments (6)

Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Orange County



Twitter Activity

Most Recent Comments

moved from NYC to chapel hill in 2014 after it was suggested to me that it was a good place …

by Ha Steffany on After 15 years, Chapel Hill is still trying to get a grip on its housing problem (Orange County)

""Unfortunately, trails have become soft spots for crime," Silva told the OSAWA board. "They're considered 'blueberry patches' now—easy places to …

by Sean D Sorrentino on Not Everyone Wants the Mountains-to-Sea Trail in Their Backyard (Orange County)

I was a manager at UNC Hospitals house keeping for over 5 years. During that time, numerous housekeepers were fired …

by jbourgeois on UNC housekeepers demand a break (Orange County)

NEWS FLASH: THING HAPPENS ON FACEBOOK. also some vague information on a topic people actually care about. …

by Derek Gude on Do Homeless Services Belong in Downtown Carrboro? (Orange County)

would like to see a more thorough discussion of this topic, with more voices, Ontjes isn't directly quoted here, and …

by W.b. Isley on Do Homeless Services Belong in Downtown Carrboro? (Orange County)

Comments

moved from NYC to chapel hill in 2014 after it was suggested to me that it was a good place …

by Ha Steffany on After 15 years, Chapel Hill is still trying to get a grip on its housing problem (Orange County)

""Unfortunately, trails have become soft spots for crime," Silva told the OSAWA board. "They're considered 'blueberry patches' now—easy places to …

by Sean D Sorrentino on Not Everyone Wants the Mountains-to-Sea Trail in Their Backyard (Orange County)

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation