Can medical scans cause cancer? | EarthTalk | Indy Week
Pin It

Can medical scans cause cancer? 

Q: Should I fear radiation exposure associated with medical scans such as CT scans, mammograms and the like?

A: The short answer is ... maybe. Critics of the health care industry postulate that our society's quickness to test for disease may in fact be causing more of it, especially in the case of medical scans. To wit, the radiation dose from a typical CT scan (short for computed tomography and commonly known as a "CAT scan") is 600 times more powerful than the average chest X-ray.

A 2007 study by Dr. Amy Berrington de González of the National Cancer Institute projected that the 72 million CT scans conducted yearly in the U.S. (not including scans conducted after a cancer diagnosis or performed at the end of life) will likely cause some 29,000 cancers resulting in 15,000 deaths two to three decades later. Scans of the abdomen, pelvis, chest and head were deemed most likely to cause cancer, and patients aged 35 to 54 were more likely to develop cancer as a result of CT scans than other age groups.

Another study found that, among Americans who received CT scans, upward of 20 percent had a false positive after one scan and 33 percent after two, meaning that such patients were getting huge doses of radiation without cause. And about 7 percent of those patients underwent unnecessary invasive medical procedures following their misleading scans. CT scans are much more common today than in earlier decades, exacerbating the potential damage from false positives and excessive radiation exposure.

"Physicians and their patients cannot be complacent about the hazards of radiation or we risk creating a public-health time bomb," says Dr. Rita Redberg, a cardiologist at University of California-San Francisco. "To avoid unnecessarily increasing cancer incidence in future years, every clinician must carefully assess the expected benefits of each CT scan and fully inform his or her patients of the known risks of radiation."

CT scans are not the only concern. Mammograms are now routine for women more than 40 years old. But some studies suggest that these types of screenings may cause more cancers than they prevent. Because of this, the federally funded U.S. Preventive Services Task Force now recommends that women not otherwise considered high risk for breast cancer wait until age 50 to begin getting mammograms—and then to get them every two years instead of annually. However, the American Cancer Society argues that such restraint would result in women dying unnecessarily from delaying screenings.

Women with a family history of breast cancer may be at greatest risk. Researchers from the University Medical Center Groningen in the Netherlands found that five or more X-rays—or any exposure to radiation—before the age of 20 for "high risk" women increased the likelihood of developing breast cancer later by a factor of two and a half.

Individuals should ask tough questions of their physicians to determine if. and how much, screening is absolutely necessary to look for suspected abnormalities. Our knowledge of the risks of radiation-based screenings will only help us to make more informed decisions about our health.

Send your environmental questions to: EarthTalk®, c/o E – The Environmental Magazine, P.O. Box 5098, Westport, CT 06881; earthtalk@emagazine.com. E is a nonprofit publication. Subscribe: www.emagazine.com/subscribe.

  • Should I fear radiation exposure associated with medical scans such as CT scans, mammograms and the like?

Latest in EarthTalk

More by EarthTalk

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in EarthTalk

  • Thyroid cancer on the rise

    Instances of people with thyroid problems seem to be on the rise. Is there an environmental connection?
    • May 18, 2011
  • How healthy is soy?

    How healthy is soy?

    I heard that, despite its healthy image, most soy is grown using chemicals like other crops and is even being genetically modified.
    • May 11, 2011
  • The state of the air

    The state of the air

    Is air quality in the United States improving or getting worse? Is it cleaner in some parts of the country than in others?
    • Apr 27, 2011
  • More »


Twitter Activity

Most Recent Comments

Best Wrapping Plastic
All of QuickWrap's shrinkwrap is 100% virgin resin material with extremely consistent mil thickness and opacity. It …

by aayanleayanle on Recycling plastic food wrap (EarthTalk)

Comments that are not contributing

by aayanleayanle on Recycling plastic food wrap (EarthTalk)

Thank you for this article. My husband and I just got our own place and we finally have room for …

by Lyla Burns on The benefits of hydroponics (EarthTalk)

I am a grower of kenaf and would like to invite those interested in having people join with me in …

by solarentrep on Kenaf: Paper without the wood (EarthTalk)

I'm surprised the article didn't mention the fluoride-thyroid connection. Fluoride is just one of a great many environmental hormone disruptors.

by oldmagnolia on Thyroid cancer on the rise (EarthTalk)

Comments

Best Wrapping Plastic
All of QuickWrap's shrinkwrap is 100% virgin resin material with extremely consistent mil thickness and opacity. It …

by aayanleayanle on Recycling plastic food wrap (EarthTalk)

Comments that are not contributing

by aayanleayanle on Recycling plastic food wrap (EarthTalk)

Most Read

  1. Safe Spaces (Letters to the Editor)
  2. Recounting Him Out (Peripheral Visions)

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation