Pin It

Bush's illegal war 

A rising number of Americans believe that the Bush administration has failed to provide legitimate justification for starting a war against Iraq. Some members of Congress are trying to reign in the administration, urging the president to let the inspections work. The recent proposed resolution by Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-Texas), which would void last October's congressional grant of authority to the president to initiate an attack on Iraq, reflects a fact much discussed in international circles but, until now, neglected by the media here at home: Attacking Iraq would also violate fundamental norms of international law.

Three bodies of law determine whether the planned war against Iraq is legal: U.S. domestic law, international treaty law, and fundamental norms of international law. The U.S. Constitution gives only Congress the power to decide when to go to war against another nation. The president must obtain Congress's consent before beginning a war. Bush obtained congressional consent last year in a resolution that mentions everything from Saddam Hussein's alleged plans to assassinate Bush's father to the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. That congressional authorization of force violates the United Nations Charter, a U.S. treaty ratified by almost every other country in the world, which prohibits the use of force by one country against another except in two situations: where necessary for self-defense, or where approved by the U.N. Security Council.

The self-defense exception exists only in response to an armed attack or in response to one that is imminent. Iraq has not attacked the United States, and our own defense intelligence has determined that Iraq does not have the capacity to do so. None of the reasons given by the Bush administration or Congress, including destruction of claimed weapons of mass destruction or overthrowing Hussein, constitute self-defense under the U.N. charter. Nor is there U.N. Security Council approval for an attack on Iraq. Rather, the council ordered that inspections be conducted to determine compliance with its 1991 directive that Iraq surrender all its weapons of mass destruction. Only the council--not the United States--has the authority to decide the consequences should the inspections prove that Iraq has not complied with the 1991 resolution. When the Bush administration disregards that authority, it mars our integrity as a nation and estranges the United States from the international community. The United States cannot claim to be a nation for peace if it violates the very laws and procedures that exist to keep peace.

While it may be true that, under U.S. domestic law, Congress can override a treaty, Congress broke a fundamental rule of customary international law when it gave the President authority to start a war against Iraq. The prohibition against aggressive war, like that against slavery and torture, is a fundamental international law. In clear violation of this fundamental law, the Bush administration's radically new pre-emptive strike doctrine proclaims that the United States may use military force against any state it perceives to be hostile; any state that seeks to acquire biological, chemical or nuclear weapons; or any one that aids terrorism.

Illegal conduct has a price. The price in this case is fourfold: (1) Bush is destroying the international constructs that require pursuit of peaceful solutions, and setting a dangerous precedent that encourages countries to use military might to get what they want; (2) an illegal pre-emptive strike on Iraq will increase terrorism--something the Bush administration is acknowledging by calling up 256,000 reservists and National Guard members to try to protect us at home from the intensified threat; (3) money that our failing economy desperately needs is being spent on this illegal war, resulting in a deepening of the crisis in health care, education, housing, and employment here at home; (4) hundreds of thousands of fellow human beings will die.

If we allow this administration to rely on the power of violence rather than the rule of law, we the people will pay the price--not George Bush, Dick Cheney and the rest of the oil industry's elite. That fact alone justifies indictment of this administration.

Elizabeth Haddix is national vice president of the National Lawyers Guild, and is a civil rights and employment attorney in Raleigh.

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Front Porch

  • One vote

    • Nov 12, 2014
  • Box of one

    Was I paying to be helped or to feel important, a bona fide expert on only myself?
    • Sep 24, 2014
  • The Old South (Hills)

    • Sep 17, 2014
  • More »

Facebook Activity

Twitter Activity

Comments

Follow-up to my "nervous mom" comment. The last coupe of weeks we have been in many situations with individuals that …

by paulapowers on Governor's School blues (Front Porch)

I appreciate your feedback and comments as a mom whose daughter is our schools nominee for Governor's School. We have …

by paulapowers on Governor's School blues (Front Porch)

Most Read

  1. Pope responds (Letters to the Editor)
  2. Ghosts of Pat McCrory's past, present and future (Citizen)
  3. 2014 The year in photos (Photo Journal)
  4. Precious little (Peripheral Visions)

© 2014 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation