Bush's failure | Editorial | Indy Week
Pin It

Bush's failure 

We failed. We failed as a government, we failed as a republic, we failed as a civilization. That's what war means. The decision to attack Iraq is the final, tragic result of so many failures on so many levels.

By the president's own standards, we have failed diplomatically, and in Brobdingnagian proportions. Starting out with the unquestioned allegiance of our most devoted allies, overwhelming international support in the first Gulf War, and worldwide demonstrations of sympathy after 9-11, the Bush administration has somehow managed to alienate our friends (my God, even Canada), pulverize international support for our efforts to disarm Saddam Hussein, and turn the vast majority of the people of the world against us. All in 19 months.

As a nation, we let it happen. We were so shaken by those terrorist attacks that we stopped thinking critically about our government. Support for the executive branch replaced the reverence for firefighters killed in the World Trade Center. We didn't want to know about those clothes from the Gap found inside the cab of a fire engine. We let the President and his advisors lie to us so many times about the reasons for this war--to stop al Qaeda; no, to head off an attack on the U.S.; no, because of noncompliance with UN resolutions--that we never insisted on knowing the real ones. If you'd like to find out, start with Paul Wolfowitz, whose 1992 "Defense Planning Guidance," written for Bush 41 (and rejected by him), called for pre-emptive attacks over containment. It was the blueprint for Bush 43's National Security Strategy.

And the mainstream media failed us. Newspapers and television adopted a jingoism after 9-11 they never relaxed, gradually substituting the administration's point of view on Iraq for stories about terrorism and Afghanistan. Need a sign of their superficiality? Paul Wolfowitz's name shows up 15 times in The News & Observer's archive. It shows up 149 times in PBS's, which did a good job exploring the issue. Years from now this whole episode, regardless of the war's outcome, will be seen as a low point in American journalism rivaling Hearst's escapades leading up to the Spanish-American War. Remember the Maine? Remember the Aluminum Tubes.

It didn't have to come to this. The threat of force was working. A united international front could have taken us much further. Instead, we chose war. We failed. Let's hope what comes next isn't nearly as bad.

More by Richard Hart


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Editorial

Twitter Activity


Fresh ideas are essential to progressive journalism - Bravo to the new team - it feels like the old Indy …

by Bonnie Hauser on A Brief Note on the Indy's Recent Personnel Changes (Editorial)

Good luck to Skillet and Grayson! I've enjoyed their work for years and will miss them in these pages. …

by john i on A Brief Note on the Indy's Recent Personnel Changes (Editorial)

Most Read

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation