Bush gets stoned in W. | Film Review | Indy Week
Pin It

Bush gets stoned in W. 

click to enlarge Josh Brolin as W. - PHOTO BY SIDNEY RAY BALDWIN/ LIONSGATE FILMS

W. is now playing throughout the Triangle

It's hard to tell what Oliver Stone is aiming at with W. As a political missive, it's an incredibly banal sermon to the choir. As a raucous raspberry, it's just not stylistically batty enough to register. As a comedy, it's never much nuttier than a Saturday Night Live skit. And as a historical film, it's too speculative by half. What results is a restless, uncooperative film that exhibits a fascinating tension between earnest message movie and bombastic cartoon, occupying the eerie area between Bush's manipulation of information and his inability to grasp it.

Josh Brolin's daffy, purposefully one-note performance as George W. Bush gets unnerving, and not only because the crude caricature often captures the man. While Thandie Newton plays Condoleezza Rice literally stooped over with sycophancy, and Richard Dreyfuss (Dick Cheney) can hardly keep from winking at the camera, Brolin's Bush is not aware that he's in a movie, and he's barely aware that he's president.

Stone's Bush can be obstinate and vulnerable in the same moment—when he asks Cheney "What do you want me to do?" he is being both belligerent and literal. Telling Cheney "We don't use torture," it's unclear whether he means it with a wink ("We don't use that word") or if he genuinely thinks their post-Geneva tactics really are in bounds. While I couldn't help but want W. to go off the rails more than it does, it gets plenty of mileage out of the strange character that emerges despite the surface simplicity. During a prayer scene, Stone cuts to close-ups of Jesus, implying that Bush isn't so much praying to Christ as identifying with him. It's not only effective but subtle, not something usually associated with Stone's style.

A lot of W. is a tough slog. The good-ol'-boy stuff of Bush's youth is generic, and the ready-made father-son tension is predictable. In Stone's world, Cheney and Rumsfeld are vocal about the door that 9/11 has opened for world domination, and talk frankly about creating an empire of oil. You get the feeling that it should incense or titillate us to see our suspicions about their backroom conversations confirmed. But this administration has been so open about its disregard for international law and transparency with the public that conspiracy theories are less tantalizing than they are obvious.

Other political aspects of W. aren't so simple. In the leftist world of Oliver Stone, Colin Powell is hardly a good guy, but in the insular world of W.—the movie exists almost entirely in Bush's house, his stadium, his country club—Powell becomes a voice of reason. Is Stone implicitly participating in the national shift to the right that Karl Rove engineered under Bush, or is this his sly way of pointing it out? It's hard to be sure, but that might be one of the key ideas in W. While it's a messy movie without much momentum, it embraces a willful confusion—one that history might prove to be a perfectly appropriate response to the last eight years.

  • Oliver Stone's W. is an obvious yet worthwhile exercise in instant history.

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Film Review



Twitter Activity

Most Recent Comments

I am indeed very happy for my life; My name is Vargas Cynthia I never thought that I will live …

by Vargas Cynthia on Axis of Cinema (Film Review)

The lobster is arbitrarily asinine, disjointed, and gratuitously violent towards both humans and former humans that "didn't make it." If …

by Marco_Polo on The Lobster Surreally Skewers Society’s Fear of Single People (Film Review)

The only peeople who murdered those boys were let off by an inexperienced prosecutor and hoodwinked judge. The facts are …

by Greg 1 on The West Memphis Three are free ... what about the real killer? (Film Review)

"Miles Ahead"... "opening Friday".... where? I'm having a tough time finding film times/locations on www.indyweek.com now. The …

by Tbone on Don Cheadle’s Miles Davis Film, Miles Ahead, Isn’t a Real Biopic—It’s Something Better (Film Review)

Comments

I am indeed very happy for my life; My name is Vargas Cynthia I never thought that I will live …

by Vargas Cynthia on Axis of Cinema (Film Review)

The lobster is arbitrarily asinine, disjointed, and gratuitously violent towards both humans and former humans that "didn't make it." If …

by Marco_Polo on The Lobster Surreally Skewers Society’s Fear of Single People (Film Review)

Most Read

No recently-read stories.

Visit the archives…

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation