Pin It
If you need any more proof than Bob Geary's story this week about the vanishing role voters are playing in North Carolina, look no further than Chatham County.

Bunkey-mandering 

If you need any more proof than Bob Geary's story this week about the vanishing role voters are playing in North Carolina, look no further than Chatham County. In May, voters rebelled against the county's downward spiral into sprawl by bouncing Commissioner Bunkey Morgan and his allies off the county board. It was a resounding victory for democracy and citizen activism.

But Morgan, who is backed by the region's major real estate interests, isn't riding off into the sunset. Instead, he's approving subdivisions left and right, pushing through water plans to open up more rural acres to development and--in an attempt to make sure those pesky voters stop interfering--is revamping Chatham's electoral systems to facilitate his return to office and dilute the political base of his opponents.

So, with a nod to Harper's, we offer "The Bunkey Index":

  • Number of months Morgan held office before he lost, during which he could have initiated redistricting if it were a priority: 42
  • Months after his defeat that he made the proposal: 2
  • Months he gave the redistricting committee to draft a plan completely redrawing voting maps and switching from at-large voting to voting by district: less than one
  • Number of committee members representing northeastern Chatham, where nearly half the county's population is concentrated and where Morgan is least popular: zero
  • Commissioner elections won by African-Americans under the at-large voting in place for three decades: 8
  • Black candidates elected prior to at-large voting: 0
  • Amount given to Morgan's campaign four days before the 2006 primary by County Attorney Bob Gunn, who presided over the nullification of legal challenges to Morgan's candidacy in 2002: $200
  • Percentage increase in Gunn's retainer Morgan supported one month later: 21
  • Year in which Morgan could seek office again under the current electoral system: 2010
  • Year in which he can under the proposal: 2008

That's just a small snapshot of the power struggles happening in Chatham right now. If you feel the urge to contribute to one of many citizen groups fighting the good fight--and hear some great music in the process--see Best Bets on page 5. For another example of corporate interests prevailing over civic ones near Siler City, see Triangles on page 12. And to see live action and maybe weigh in yourself, head down the courthouse in Pittsboro on Aug. 21 at 6 p.m., for the public hearing on the redistricting scheme. Don't let them make you invisible.

Comments (0)

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Editorial

More by Jennifer Strom

  • Sandy face

    The week after Hurricane Sandy, we were no longer residents of the Lower East Side, of Chelsea or Chinatown, TriBeCa or Battery Park. We were the newly dubbed neighborhood of SoPo: "South of Power."
    • Nov 7, 2012
  • More »

Facebook Activity

Twitter Activity

Read indyweek's Tweets

Comments

Let them do it. I appreciate the fact that the GOP is intent on making the fasted growing community in …

by Nate on Strike down the discriminatory driver's licenses (Editorial)

I'm anxiously awaiting the parade down Jones Street of enterprising women in pasties decorated with drawings of nipples on them. …

by Mojo on When nipples are outlawed, only outlaws will have nipples (Editorial)

© 2013 Indy Week • 302 E. Pettigrew St., Suite 300, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation